THE GROWING LIBRARY
What are you curious about?
Search farm stories, growing guides, crop profiles and equipment. Try a crop, a field problem or a step between harvest and food.
Start with
[{"title": "October farm notebook: rice harvest, mustard and banana care", "summary": "Rice harvested, mustard sown, and banana care continuing: October brings several seasons of work together.", "text": "Rice harvested, mustard sown, bananas still needing water: October held several points in the growing year at once. The next crop was beginning before all the work on the last had finished.\n\n## October on the farm\n\nBy 18 October 2026, the Navara red rice harvest was complete and mustard had been sown. One stretch of work was ending as another began.\n\nAmong the bananas, the second top dressing and earthing-up were finished, while irrigation was still underway. These plants needed attention alongside the seasonal crops, each with its own pace of growth.\n\n## The quieter work\n\nTwo days later, manual wild-paddy removal in the rice known here as 1718 was complete. It was a smaller milestone than a harvest, but part of the same season’s work.\n\nThat is what we want to follow in this journal: the harvests, certainly, but also the care between them. The jobs that take more than one day. The crops still growing when attention turns to the next sowing.\n\nOctober’s story is in that overlap. Harvesting, planting and tending all belong on the same page.", "type": "Farm story", "url": "/stories/between-seasons/", "tags": ["rice", "banana", ""]}, {"title": "Tissue-culture banana: nursery hardening and planting material", "summary": "A look at tissue culture, nursery hardening and choosing planting material with care.", "text": "A banana plant can reach the field small enough to hide the work already behind it. For a tissue-culture plant, that journey includes multiplication under controlled conditions and an adjustment to life outside. The nursery is where those two parts of the story meet.\n\n## From a shoot tip to a young plant\n\nTissue culture multiplies plants under controlled conditions. BARC describes a process that begins with shoot tips, moves through shoot and root development, and continues through two stages of hardening before field planting. [1]\n\nHardening helps young plants adjust from protected conditions to life outside. Ask the nursery whether this stage is complete and what care the plants will need on arrival.\n\n## Choose the plants and prepare the ground\n\nAsk for the variety, batch reference and any supporting health testing or certification. “Tissue culture” describes how plants were multiplied; it does not guarantee that every plant is free of disease.\n\nThe field matters just as much as the nursery. The National Horticulture Board highlights drainage and suitable growing conditions in its banana guidance. In North India, local temperatures, soil and irrigation should inform planting decisions. A national fertiliser schedule needs local interpretation before use. [2]\n\n## Once planting is behind you\n\nOur October farm notes offer a glimpse of the care that follows establishment. By 18 October, the second banana top dressing and earthing-up were complete, with irrigation continuing.\n\nThe nursery batch and planting date give later growth a starting point. Returning to the same plants in photographs can then show how they are establishing, including changes that a collection of unrelated close-ups would hide.\n\nThe curated farm archive records tissue-culture planting in July 2026; supplier and nursery batch details are not established here. The photograph shows a young banana plant from our archive; the tissue-culture explanation above draws on the linked research.", "type": "Crops", "url": "/stories/tissue-culture-banana/", "tags": ["banana", ""]}, {"title": "Rice growth stages: tillers, flowering and grain filling", "summary": "Tillers, flowering and filling grain: the changes to look for as rice develops.", "text": "New shoots at the base, a swelling within the leaf sheath, a panicle emerging: rice changes its shape as it develops. Learning those landmarks turns a field of green into a crop whose next stage is easier to follow.\n\n## Three phases to follow\n\nIRRI groups rice development into three broad phases. Vegetative growth runs from germination to panicle initiation. Reproductive development continues to flowering. Ripening follows flowering and ends at maturity. [1]\n\nTwo words make these stages easier to follow. A tiller is a shoot growing from the plant’s base. A panicle is the branching flower head that carries the grain.\n\n## What to look for\n\nEarly on, watch for the crop building leaves and tillers. Later, look for the swelling around the developing panicle, often called the boot, followed by the panicle emerging and flowering. After flowering, attention turns to grain filling and maturity. Some stages need a closer look than a photograph can provide. [1]\n\n## Let the crop lead the calendar\n\nGrowth duration varies with variety and environment. FAO’s irrigation guidance uses the same broad phases, but a schedule from another region cannot tell you exactly where your own crop stands. Pair dates with observations in the field. [2]\n\nOn this farm, Navara red rice had been harvested by 18 October 2026. It is one dated point in the season; we do not yet have the full sowing-to-harvest timeline to share.\n\n## Take a closer photograph\n\nThe base shows tillers; the whole plant puts them in context; the panicle shows the later stage in detail. A dated set of these views can follow development through the season. “Panicles emerging” gives the next visit a clear comparison, while harvest readiness still needs a fuller field assessment.", "type": "Crops", "url": "/stories/reading-rice-development/", "tags": ["rice", ""]}, {"title": "Rice variety names: seed identity and season records", "summary": "What a variety name can tell you—and what to check before deciding what to grow.", "text": "Navara and 1718 appear side by side in our rice notes, but their names leave different questions open. The archive calls one Navara red rice and uses a number for the other. Following both crops means knowing where the names came from as well as what happened in the field.\n\n## Begin with a clear identity\n\nKeep the seed label, supplier details and batch reference. Shorthand that works in a farm notebook may leave questions later, especially when similar names or spellings appear.\n\nOur October notes name Navara red rice and a rice crop known here as 1718. Navara had been harvested by 18 October; manual wild-paddy removal in 1718 was finished on 20 October. We use those names as they appear in the farm notes, without assigning an unconfirmed full cultivar name to 1718.\n\n## Ask about the growing season\n\nVariety and environment both affect how long rice takes to develop. A name alone cannot tell you when a particular field will be ready to harvest. IRRI’s guide to the rice plant is a useful starting point for understanding those differences. [1]\n\nWhen choosing seed, seek local recommendations for your growing conditions and season. Keep the seed documentation alongside the planting date so you can follow the crop from the beginning.\n\n## Learn from a season, carefully\n\nSowing, transplanting and harvest dates reveal how a variety moved through that season. A harvest weight becomes a yield only when the area it came from is known too.\n\nOne season can teach you a great deal about a field. Comparing varieties takes more care: weather, soil and management can all differ. A familiar name or a good-looking crop is a starting point for questions, rather than proof of a yield or quality advantage.", "type": "Crops", "url": "/stories/rice-varieties-and-names/", "tags": ["rice", ""]}, {"title": "NPK fertiliser labels: what the numbers mean", "summary": "NPK numbers describe nutrient analysis, not how much a particular crop should receive. Product weight and nutrient weight are different quantities.", "text": "One corrected abbreviation changed the account of our October banana feeding: DAP became APS. The difference was more than a name. Each product carries a different nutrient analysis, just as the numbers 12:61:0 and 19:19:19 describe different contents.\n\nReading the bag makes those differences visible before they are lost in a list of fertilisers.\n\n## What N, P and K actually mean\n\nThe three headline numbers commonly describe percentages by weight of nitrogen (N), phosphate expressed as P₂O₅, and potash expressed as K₂O. The last two are label conventions, rather than percentages of elemental phosphorus and potassium. [1]\n\nA 10 kg bag marked 10:10:10 therefore supplies 1 kg of nitrogen and the equivalent of 1 kg each of P₂O₅ and K₂O. The weight of the product and the weight of its nutrients are different things.\n\n## The names that recur in our logs\n\n- Urea is a nitrogen fertiliser. Its nitrogen contribution belongs in the total even when another product in the same programme also supplies nitrogen.\n- MOP means muriate of potash, a potassium source. “Potash” in a working note still needs a product label to establish the actual grade.\n- SSP means single superphosphate. Alongside phosphate, grades of SSP can supply sulphur; check the declared analysis. [6]\n- DAP means diammonium phosphate. The familiar 18:46:0 grade supplies nitrogen and phosphate, with no potash declared in those three numbers.\n- APS means ammonium phosphate sulphate. The 20:20:0:13 product supplies nitrogen, phosphate and sulphur. The fourth number is sulphur; it does not turn the zero into potassium.\n- 12:61:0 and 19:19:19 are grades, rather than instructions. The former has no potash declared; the latter includes all three headline nutrients. Solubility, intended use and the manufacturer's directions still matter. [1, 3, 4, 5]\n\n## A correction worth keeping\n\nOur October banana record first called one component DAP. The corrected entry identifies APS 20:20:0:13. That is a meaningful change: the products have different nutrient analyses. Repeating the earlier abbreviation would change our understanding of the feeding round.\n\nThe same caution applies to zinc and sulphur. They appear in farm discussions alongside NPK, but their inclusion should answer a crop or soil need. They are not automatic additions to every feeding.\n\n## Reading a blend without mistaking it for a plan\n\nFor any nutrient, multiply the product weight by the percentage on its label, then add the contributions from each product. One kilogram of 20:20:0:13 contains 200 g N, 200 g P₂O₅ equivalent and 130 g sulphur. This is label arithmetic, not a suggested application. [5]\n\nA ratio of products is not the same as an NPK ratio. Two mixtures with the same total weight can supply very different nutrients.\n\n## The field completes the picture\n\nA suitable soil test, interpreted for the crop and region, helps establish what is already present. Previous fertiliser, manure and other inputs must be counted too. Soil condition and growth stage affect the decision; a pale leaf alone cannot prescribe a bag. [2, 3]\n\nProduct, grade and amount establish the nutrient contribution. Area or plant count, date and method show where and how it was supplied. Together they explain far more than the number of bags bought.", "type": "Field Guide", "url": "/stories/understanding-npk/", "tags": ["banana", "rice", "feeding", "npk", "fertiliser", "bag", "grade", "aps", "dap"]}, {"title": "Waterlogging and roots: what to observe after rain", "summary": "Prolonged saturation can restrict air around roots. Read the crop, drainage and duration together; standing water has a different meaning in managed paddy.", "text": "Around a banana mound, water can be easy to see and its effect below ground harder to judge. As water fills soil spaces that normally hold air, prolonged saturation can leave roots short of oxygen. The wet surface is the visible beginning of that problem.\n\n## What prolonged saturation can do\n\nThe RHS describes poor growth, yellowing and root damage among the possible effects of waterlogging. Compaction and poor drainage can make it harder for water to leave. Those symptoms have other causes too, so a yellow leaf on its own is not a diagnosis. [1]\n\n## Start by watching the water\n\nNotice where it collects, how long it stays and which plants are affected. Compare the same area during the wet period and after water has drained away.\n\nCheck accessible drainage outlets for blockages where it is safe to do so, and avoid working or trampling saturated soil. In pots, drainage holes and a suitable growing medium help excess water escape. Larger drainage changes need local assessment; a garden remedy is not a design for a whole farm. [1]\n\n## Rice is a different case\n\nManaged standing water is part of many paddy-rice systems. FAO’s guidance explains water management in relation to rice growth stages. Crop, soil and water regime matter: standing water alone does not show that a rice field is being poorly managed. [2]\n\n## A wet spell in the farm notebook\n\nOn 20 August 2026, the farm archive records repeated rain and water standing around banana for about a week. Drainage work was under way. By 7 September, saturated ground was still delaying soil feeding. Those notes describe conditions and decisions; they do not establish a measured root injury or yield loss.\n\nOur archive photograph shows water between banana mounds. Its capture date is unverified, so it illustrates the setting without being assigned to that particular wet spell.\n\n## When the water leaves\n\nAfter drainage, the same patches can show whether the ground is becoming workable and whether new leaves are continuing to emerge. Persistent symptoms deserve further assessment; a single yellow leaf cannot settle their cause.\n\nThe surface may dry before the ground beneath it is fit to carry people or equipment. That difference matters when deciding which delayed job can begin.", "type": "Field Guide", "url": "/stories/waterlogging-and-roots/", "tags": ["banana", "rice", "water", "waterlogging", "roots", "drainage", "flooding"]}, {"title": "Can you grow a sprouted potato? Seed potatoes and garden care", "summary": "Yes—but choosing healthy planting material gives a small garden experiment a better beginning.", "text": "The eyes on a potato are buds. When they sprout, the tuber makes the beginning of a new plant visible on a kitchen shelf. Growing a dependable crop starts a little earlier, with the choice of tuber that will go into the ground.\n\n## Start with seed potatoes\n\nSeed potatoes are tubers grown for planting, rather than packets of botanical seed. University of Minnesota Extension recommends certified seed potatoes because grocery potatoes may carry disease or have been treated to inhibit sprouting. [1]\n\nFor a dependable crop, choose suitable seed potatoes from a reputable supplier. If you experiment with a kitchen potato, keep the trial small and separate from established potato beds.\n\n## Give the shoots a good start\n\nChitting means allowing short shoots to develop before planting. RHS guidance recommends a cool, bright, frost-free place for this stage. [2]\n\nChoose a sunny bed or a container with drainage. Plant with the shoots facing upwards, handle them gently and cover with soil. Keep the growing medium moist without leaving it saturated. As the plants grow, build soil around the stems so developing tubers stay covered. [1, 2]\n\nFollow your supplier’s advice and local guidance for planting depth, spacing and season. British and Minnesota planting calendars need adjusting for North Indian conditions.\n\n## Follow the experiment\n\nA small trial is easier to understand when the tuber source and planting date are known. Photographs of the first shoots and later leaves show its progress; watering, setbacks and the eventual harvest explain more of the growing conditions.\n\nThis is a growing guide, not a completed trial from our farm. We will share a separate account when there is a potato experiment to follow.\n\n## Keep potatoes out of the light\n\nStore harvested potatoes away from light to help prevent greening. Do not eat green or badly sprouted potatoes, and do not taste a questionable tuber to test whether it is safe. [1]", "type": "Garden", "url": "/stories/sprouted-potatoes/", "tags": [""]}, {"title": "Soil and foliar feeding: basal, top-dressing and fertigation", "summary": "Basal feeding, top-dressing, foliar feeding and fertigation deliver nutrients in different ways. The product, placement and conditions matter together.", "text": "Wet ground held up the banana soil-feeding round in September. Foliar feeding continued in the meantime; the first soil top-dressing came later, followed by rain that replaced a planned irrigation. The sequence puts several often-confused feeding terms into an actual season.\n\n## Different ways of supplying nutrients\n\nBasal feeding supplies nutrients at establishment. Top-dressing adds fertiliser to the soil while the crop is growing. Foliar feeding applies a suitable nutrient solution to the leaves. Fertigation is a fourth route: nutrients delivered through an irrigation system. These are different methods, with different placement and product requirements. [1]\n\nOur archive records both soil feeding and foliar rounds in banana. It does not establish that this plantation used fertigation.\n\n## When the soil kept us waiting\n\nOn 7 September 2026, the banana ground was still saturated and soil feeding was deferred. Weed clearing continued, with foliar feeding recorded in the meantime. The first soil top-dressing began on 19 September and was reported complete on 22 September.\n\nIrrigation was the next planned task. By 24 September, rain had supplied enough moisture to make that irrigation unnecessary. The next operation changed because the field had changed.\n\nThe rain had changed the next job. Fertiliser application alone could not tell us whether more water was still needed.\n\n## Why a crop may be fed in rounds\n\nTNAU describes split nutrient applications for banana, with timing related to growth. Its schedules vary with cultivar and production system; the general idea is to match supply to demand through the crop's life. The published regional quantities are not a ready-made plan for this farm. [1]\n\nOur second banana top-dressing began in October and was confirmed complete, together with earthing-up, on 18 October. Irrigation was still ongoing. Those are three connected operations, with three separately recorded statuses.\n\nPaddy had its own timetable. The archive records nutrient work progressing by variety before seasonal fertilisation was marked complete on 30 September. One variety's finished round did not close every other field's work.\n\n## What a foliar grade leaves unsaid\n\nThe banana notes include 12:61:0 and 19:19:19 foliar rounds. Their grades describe nutrients, but not a complete spray specification. Product formulation, concentration, water volume, coverage and crop condition also belong in that decision. A soil dose cannot simply be moved into a spray tank. [1]\n\nSome later entries mention nutrient and crop-protection products together, with changes between the planned and reported mix. We keep that history without treating it as a tested tank-mix recommendation. Compatibility must be established for the exact products. [2]\n\n## Looking after the application\n\nFresh growth, persistent symptoms and rain after application all belong to the later part of a feeding round. Returning to the same plants helps show those changes. A better-looking leaf still cannot reveal, without a comparison, how much improvement came from the input.\n\nThe sequence—from wet ground to application to the crop afterwards—is what makes the round worth returning to next season.", "type": "Field Guide", "url": "/stories/feeding-soil-and-leaves/", "tags": ["banana", "rice", "feeding", "fertiliser", "foliar", "feeding", "top dressing", "fertigation"]}, {"title": "Before spraying: inspect pests, damage and the crop", "summary": "Fresh damage, live pests and crop stage help frame a response. An insecticide, fungicide, herbicide and nutrient spray do different jobs.", "text": "Leafroller scouting, a spray held up by rain, treatment moving between crops: September and October left more than one kind of pest entry in our paddy notebook. Following them means separating the insect problem from the application—and the application from its result.\n\n## Read the damage and the living pest\n\nRice leaffolder caterpillars fold leaves around themselves with silk and feed within the fold, leaving pale, lengthwise feeding marks. ICAR's insect-resource guide describes these signs. A damaged leaf is evidence to examine, rather than a measure of the whole field. [1]\n\nLook in representative places, not only the worst patch. Record the crop stage, fresh damage, live insects and how widely the problem occurs. Old damage and continuing activity are different observations.\n\n## The farm's treatment story\n\nThe archive records leafroller scouting in early September, a spray delayed by rain, and treatment progressing field by field. By 18 October, the owner confirmed insecticide spraying in the affected Sonam crop.\n\nThat confirms an operation. It does not, on its own, establish pest control, a yield benefit or treatment of every paddy variety. A return visit is part of understanding the result.\n\n## Not everything in a spray tank does the same job\n\nAn insecticide targets insects; a fungicide targets fungal disease; a herbicide targets weeds. A nutrient spray supplies plant nutrients. Using the same equipment does not make these products interchangeable.\n\nOur banana archive names chlorpyrifos in one historical insecticide round and Bavistin in a later entry described as a fungicide mix. These names help us read what was recorded. They are not recommendations for a crop, pest or mixture today: the exact formulation and current crop-use label must govern any decision.\n\n## Begin with the need, then the product\n\nIntegrated pest management brings scouting, crop management, natural enemies and treatment thresholds into the decision. TNAU explains why routine spraying without regard to need is different from this approach. If treatment is justified, it should target the identified problem while limiting effects on other organisms. [2]\n\nBefore using a product, establish its active ingredient, formulation, labelled crop and target, application directions and required intervals. Follow the label's protection, re-entry and harvest requirements. Keep equipment sound, prevent drift and contamination of water, and verify compatibility before considering a mixture. [2, 3]\n\nChanging a brand name is not enough to establish a different active ingredient. Keep both names in the record.\n\n## Make room for the return visit\n\nThe later assessment needs the reason for treatment and the details of the application: crop and area, exact product, quantity and water volume, date and weather. Those details help an adviser interpret what is found afterwards.\n\n“Sprayed” closes the application task. The next walk through the field tells us whether fresh activity has slowed, continued or moved elsewhere. That is where the next decision begins.", "type": "Field Guide", "url": "/stories/reading-pests-before-spraying/", "tags": ["rice", "banana", "crop-problems", "spray", "pest", "insecticide", "fungicide", "herbicide"]}, {"title": "Farm weed control: hand weeding, rogueing and herbicides", "summary": "Weed identity, size, crop stage and establishment method shape the response. Hand removal and a herbicide application are different operations.", "text": "A cleared banana planting needed weeding again. In rice, some unwanted plants were still too short to distinguish easily above the crop. Our monsoon notes show why weed work follows the plants themselves: what is growing, where it is growing and whether it can yet be separated from the crop.\n\n## First, know what is there\n\nA grass, a sedge, a broadleaf weed and an unwanted rice plant are not the same problem. Species, weed size, crop stage and the way the crop was established all affect the options. The IRRI Rice Knowledge Bank describes weed control as a combination of prevention, field preparation, water management, hand work, machinery and correctly selected herbicides. [1]\n\nPre-emergence and post-emergence describe the application timing in relation to weed emergence. They are not interchangeable windows, and the exact product label sets its use. [1]\n\n## When the unwanted plant resembles the crop\n\nOur logs call some unwanted paddy “Jhanga”, or wild or volunteer rice. The notes do not establish a botanical identity for every patch, so we keep the local term without treating it as a confirmed species.\n\nThe farm chose manual removal. Vishnu Bhog was reported cleared on 9 October. Work in 1718 began later and the owner confirmed its completion on 20 October. The two entries describe different crops and separate rounds of work.\n\nEarlier in October, one patch was left to become easier to distinguish above the crop canopy. That was a recorded field decision, rather than a general rule to let weeds grow taller. Preventing unwanted plants from contributing more seed remains an important part of the wider weed-management problem. [1]\n\n## Around the banana plants\n\nAugust brought targeted herbicide work in heavier weed patches alongside manual clearing around plants. The archive names a glufosinate-based treatment and records yellowing weeds. That is a historical observation, not proof of full control or a product recommendation.\n\nBy 26 August, the first manual weeding cycle was recorded as complete. September brought more weeding. A finished round did not mean the ground would remain clear for the rest of the season.\n\n## A herbicide needs a precise job\n\nSelectivity means a product can affect some plants differently from others under its labelled conditions. It does not mean a spray is harmless to every crop nearby. Check the exact crop, weed, formulation, timing and water instructions before use; a product chosen for one setting cannot be assumed suitable for another. [1]\n\nKeep herbicide equipment separate from other spraying equipment, as the Meghalaya agriculture department advises. Follow the label, avoid drift onto neighbouring crops and keep spray away from water sources. A historic tank mixture is not evidence of compatibility. [2]\n\n## What to notice next time\n\nThe plants left behind can explain the limits of a finished round. Were they missed, did they survive, or did a new flush emerge after rain or soil disturbance? Their identity and location help distinguish those possibilities.\n\nHand clearing, machine work and herbicide use each leave a different history. Knowing which weeds returned after which operation gives the next round a more precise job.", "type": "Field Guide", "url": "/stories/weeds-and-the-work-between-rows/", "tags": ["rice", "banana", "crop-problems", "weeds", "weeding", "rogueing", "herbicide", "wild paddy"]}, {"title": "When to irrigate: banana, rice, rainfall and drainage", "summary": "Irrigation timing depends on the crop, growth stage and water already present. A fixed interval cannot describe every field or spell of weather.", "text": "In July, the farm needed irrigation because the monsoon had not supplied enough water. In August, low patches needed water pumped out. By late September, rain had made a planned banana irrigation unnecessary.\n\nThe pump’s next job depended on where the water already was.\n\n## Supply is only the beginning\n\nOn 27 July 2026, the farm archive records irrigation equipment being shared between banana and paddy. That small detail carries a larger practical question: which crop needs water now, and can the supply reach it in time?\n\nHours on a pump describe time, rather than the water delivered. Volume needs a measured flow; the crop, stage, area reached and ground condition help explain how that delivery was used. Recent rain and the parts still waiting for water complete the picture.\n\n## The route through the field\n\nWater control includes the inlet, channels, field levels, bunds and an outlet. Uneven ground can leave one part wet while another waits. IRRI's water-management guidance explains how levelling and separate channels help farmers control delivery and drainage. [1]\n\nOn 8 August, our archive records pumping from a waterlogged paddy patch and reusing that water elsewhere for irrigation and transplant preparation. The work was both drainage and supply. The record does not include a measured volume or water-saving result.\n\n## Rice needs its own reading\n\nWater management changes with establishment and growth stage. Direct-sown rice and transplanted rice do not begin in the same condition. Heading and flowering are particularly sensitive periods for water shortage. [1, 2]\n\nAlternate wetting and drying is a managed rice-irrigation method, using observations of the field water level and protection of sensitive stages. It is not simply leaving the crop without water for a chosen number of days. The farm notes retrieved here do not establish that this method was used. [1]\n\n## A banana field asks a different question\n\nThe September banana sequence ran from wet ground delaying soil feeding, to completed feeding, to rainfall replacing a planned irrigation. On 18 October, irrigation was again ongoing after the second feeding and earthing-up.\n\nThose entries are more useful together than a fixed watering interval would be. They show why the next visit needs to consider moisture already in the ground, the weather and the crop's condition.\n\nThe chana story offers another view: unintended water exposure was associated with uneven maturity in part of the crop. More water is not automatically more timely water.\n\n## Before starting the pump\n\n- Check the crop's growth stage and the moisture already present.\n- Look at recent rain and the near-term forecast.\n- Check whether water can reach the intended area and leave where needed.\n- Record how much of the task was completed, rather than assuming the whole farm was covered.\n- Return afterwards to look for dry stretches, leaks and water that remains trapped.\n\nIrrigation is a decision about where water belongs now. Drainage is part of the same understanding.", "type": "Field Guide", "url": "/stories/irrigation-and-the-changing-field/", "tags": ["banana", "rice", "chana", "water", "irrigation", "irrigate", "watering", "water", "banana", "rice", "timing"]}, {"title": "Tractors and implements: understand the farm operation", "summary": "A tractor supplies power; its implement explains much of the job. Levelling, cultivation, drilling and threshing each need a suitable setup.", "text": "Land levelling before planting, a rotavator between established rows, a thresher after cutting: the machine work in a farm season changes with the crop. The tractor supplies power, but the implement behind it explains much of what is happening.\n\n## Start with the job\n\nA tractor supplies power and traction. The implement determines much of the work: cultivating soil, levelling, sowing, carrying or driving another machine. TNAU's machinery guidance emphasises matching attachments and power to the operation. Horsepower alone is not a description of a complete setup. [1]\n\nOur banana archive records land levelling complete on 10 June 2026, followed by planting in July. It does not identify the tractor model, horsepower or every implement used. We can follow the operation without inventing the machine.\n\n## Names for different kinds of work\n\n- A plough breaks and turns soil during primary preparation.\n- A cultivator works the soil with tines; the setup and purpose determine where and how it is used.\n- A levelling implement addresses high and low ground. In paddy preparation, levelling follows the earlier soil work.\n- A seed drill places seed in the soil; a seed-cum-fertiliser drill also places fertiliser. Calibration belongs to the exact machine and crop.\n- A thresher separates grain from harvested crop material. Cleaning and, for hulled grain such as Khapli, dehusking remain distinct stages. [1, 5, 6]\n\nThese are a guide to the vocabulary, not a claim that every implement was used on this farm.\n\n## What a rotavator does\n\nA tractor-mounted rotavator uses rotating blades to work the soil. ICAR–CIAE's guide describes its soil-working role. It is a different operation from simply pulling a trolley or levelling a surface. [2]\n\nIn late September, our banana rotavator work resumed after the soil dried. Some sections remained and a repeat pass was planned. By 7 October, finishing the current work and beginning another pass were still on the task list.\n\nThe later confirmation of feeding and earthing-up does not establish that the second rotavator pass was completed. Keeping those tasks separate gives a more honest account of the work.\n\n## Between established plants\n\nWorking ground before planting and working around living plants are different settings. The route, available clearance and the crop already in place matter. So does whether the soil can carry the equipment without unnecessary damage. Saturated ground is not an invitation to keep working merely because a tractor is available. [1, 3]\n\nThe implement, working area, soil condition and passes describe the operation more clearly than tractor hours alone. Remaining patches show what still needs doing. Fuel consumption or cost per area needs measured quantities as well as time.\n\n## Earthing-up is another task\n\nEarthing-up brings soil towards the base of the plant. It appears separately from rotavator work in our banana notes and was confirmed complete on 18 October. In the turmeric task list, weeding, feeding and earthing-up were planned in that order; the retrieved archive did not confirm completion. [4]\n\nA tractor pass and hand work around a plant can therefore belong to the same row. Finishing one does not necessarily finish the other.\n\n## Harvest has several endings\n\nOur chana and Khapli stories distinguish cutting, drying, threshing and cleaning. Khapli then required dehusking before the grain could be used as intended. A machine that grinds flour does not necessarily remove the hull.\n\nThat is why “harvest finished” can hide several unfinished jobs. Name the stage, record the quantity in its current form, and follow the crop until the next operation is genuinely done.\n\nThe better machinery question is not simply which tractor to use. It is what the field needs, what the implement can do, and whether the conditions are right for that work.", "type": "Field Guide", "url": "/stories/tractors-tools-and-field-work/", "tags": ["banana", "chana", "khapli-wheat", "field-work", "tractor", "implement", "rotavator", "cultivator", "thresher"]}, {"title": "Chana season: three varieties and a staged Rabi harvest", "summary": "Three varieties, uneven ripening and a harvest that unfolded over several weeks. A Rabi season in words and photographs.", "text": "Chana did not finish the season in one sweep. Some plants were ready to cut while others were still green. The harvest followed in stages: cutting, drying, threshing, then the final cleaning of the grain.\n\nAcross two fields and three varieties, the Rabi 2025–26 crop kept bringing us back for a closer look.\n\n## A closer look at the green\n\nIn the photographs, the crop is full of detail: small leaflets, pale flowers and green pods tucked among the stems. A wide field view gives a sense of the crop; a closer frame shows what is developing within it.\n\nBy February, most of the crop in one field appeared to be doing well. Pod filling was underway by the end of the month. But a small patch behaved differently: roughly 50 plants flowered, then put out fresh leaves and branches. We considered possible explanations without settling on a cause.\n\nElsewhere, a burst irrigation pipe let water into part of the crop. Unintended watering became part of the season’s story, with some patches remaining green later than others.\n\n## Three varieties to follow\n\nWe grew Daftari, Pusa Manav and Pusa 362. At harvest, we kept the varieties separate so we could follow each one from the field to the cleaned grain.\n\nPusa Manav made up the largest share of the cleaned grain. To understand how the varieties compare, we will also need to know the area planted under each.\n\n## The harvest finds its own pace\n\nBy mid-March, much of the chana was approaching maturity. A patch was set aside for green chana for the household, while other areas were left to finish ripening.\n\nManual cutting began in one field on 20 March. With light drizzle and cloud forecast, the decision was to start on the mature crop rather than leave it standing.\n\nBy 30 March, that field had been cut. The other was about 60% complete, with two plots still green after unintended irrigation. There was no single date when every part of the crop was ready.\n\n## From pods to cleaned grain\n\nThe pale pods and dry stems in the photographs show a different texture from the green crop. After cutting, the plants were left to dry before threshing.\n\nThe first major threshing took place on 1 April, covering the first field and part of the second. Further cutting, drying and threshing continued into the month. The final lot was threshed by 16 April; cleaning and winnowing followed.\n\nBy 18 April, the grain was cleaned and the final total was in: 1,950 kg, or 19.5 quintals, across the three varieties.\n\n## What stays with us\n\nThe total is one way to remember the season. The uneven patches are another: fresh growth after flowering, water arriving where it was not intended, and green plants still standing beside a crop ready to cut.\n\nFor the next chana season, those differences are worth following from the start. Following each variety from its planted area to its harvest will help us learn more next time. So will returning to the field and noticing what has changed.\n\nThe 1,950 kg of cleaned chana came at the end of that staggered work. Beside the total, the season leaves a more detailed memory: mature pods waiting for cutting, green patches still growing and the final lot reaching the thresher in April.", "type": "Farm story", "url": "/stories/chana-a-season-in-stages/", "tags": ["chana", ""]}, {"title": "Khapli wheat season: growth, harvest and dehulling", "summary": "Young green leaves, tall wheat heads, a staggered harvest—and the work of turning hulled wheat into food. Our Rabi 2025–26 season, in photographs and films.", "text": "## The field begins in green\n\nIn the earliest views, the crop is still close to the ground: narrow leaves, open soil between plants and a field gradually filling with green. Later photographs bring us down among the stems. The same crop that looks like a smooth surface from a distance becomes a tangle of individual plants up close.\n\nThis was our Khapli wheat during the Rabi 2025–26 season. It occupied a smaller part of the farm than our other wheat. Its story would continue well beyond cutting: the harvested grain would still need releasing from its husk.\n\n## A field worth slowing down for\n\nBy February, the crop had been irrigated and was moving through its reproductive stages. Long stems and emerging heads were beginning to give the field a different outline.\n\nSome of the most memorable views need little explanation: light through a young leaf, rows seen from ground level, the whole field changing colour as the sun lowers. They are part of the season too, alongside the work recorded in the notebook.\n\n## When the stems gave way\n\nThe taller crop did not stay upright everywhere. By 20 March, we estimated that about 10% of the Khapli had lodged—bent or fallen over.\n\nFlattened swathes lay among plants still standing, changing the pattern of the field. We had been watching the wind and unsettled weather, though we could not put the lodging down to a single cause.\n\nMost of the crop remained standing. Attention turned towards maturity and deciding when to begin cutting.\n\n## A harvest taken in stages\n\nWe chose to cut the Khapli by hand and keep it separate from the other wheat. By 9 April, roughly 70% had been cut. The grain felt hard when examined, but we wondered whether some of the cutting had been a little early.\n\nThe cut stalks were left to dry further rather than being threshed immediately. The rest of the crop stayed standing for several more days.\n\nBy then, part of the harvest lay drying while part was still standing. Cutting and threshing had become separate decisions, with the condition of the grain still in question.\n\n## The grain was still inside its husk\n\nBy 18 April, the harvest total was in: 510 kg of hulled Khapli. The grain was still enclosed in its husk, with another stage of work ahead before it could reach the kitchen.\n\nThe distinction became clearer when we processed a batch in June. On 10 June, 54 kg of hulled wheat yielded 32.5 kg of cleaned grain: a recovery of about 60.2% for that batch.\n\nThose paired weights gave us a measure of the cleaned grain returned from that batch. They do not establish recovery for the whole 510 kg harvest, or separate the weight of husks, other material removed and any processing losses.\n\n## The season continued beyond the field\n\nSome of the harvest was kept for household use and future planting. The work had moved from tending a crop to handling and processing what it had produced.\n\nWhat stays with us is the length of that journey. The young green field, the heads moving in the light, the patches that fell, the cut stalks left to dry—and then the extra task of releasing the grain from its husk.\n\nThe next season has specific questions to carry forward: how any lodged patches develop, when each part is ready for cutting, and what a dehusking batch returns. The field and the processing work belong in the same decision about how much Khapli to grow.", "type": "Farm story", "url": "/stories/khapli-from-field-to-grain/", "tags": ["khapli-wheat", ""]}, {"title": "Before sowing: read seed labels and plan establishment", "summary": "Seed identity, purity and germination answer different questions. Keep the lot label linked to the sowing method and field record.", "text": "The rice called 1718 in our farm archive has a name we can follow through the season. It is still a shortened name: the archive does not establish its full cultivar identity. That small gap explains the value of the label on a seed bag. Long after sowing, it can answer questions that a familiar name leaves open.\n\n## Read identity before reputation\n\nBefore emptying the bag, photograph its label and keep it with the receipt. Crop, full variety name, producer and lot number connect the material bought to the crop being grown. Test date, declared germination and purity, validity information and any treatment warning deserve the same attention. TNAU includes these details in its seed-quality guidance. [1]\n\nA lot number becomes especially useful when two deliveries of the same variety arrive together. Keeping them separate through handling preserves the chance to understand a later difference in establishment. Once their contents are mixed, the bags alone can no longer tell that story.\n\n## Purity and germination answer different questions\n\nA clean-looking sample may contain very little straw or dust. That tells us little about how many seeds will produce normal seedlings, or whether the variety is the one expected.\n\nPhysical purity separates crop seed, other seeds and inert material. Germination measures normal seedlings under the test conditions. Genetic identity is another question. TNAU describes laboratory assessment of purity, moisture, germination and other distinguishable varieties; one result cannot stand in for them all. [2]\n\nThe germination percentage also belongs to a tested sample at a particular time. A dry, crusted or flooded seedbed can give sound seed a poor start. For saved seed or a lot with an uncertain history, a seed laboratory can explain how to submit a representative sample before the field is committed.\n\n## Match the plan to the method\n\nOur rice archive includes nursery sowing, transplanting and a separately direct-broadcast crop. Each puts seed or plants into a different setting. A nursery date and a transplanting date describe two events in the same crop's life; keeping both makes later references to crop age intelligible.\n\nA drill adds another variable: how much it actually delivers. Penn State's calibration guidance accounts for seed characteristics and germination as well as the machine's setting. The actual seed lot belongs in the calibration test, alongside a locally suitable sowing target. A setting borrowed from another bag may deliver a different number of seeds. [3]\n\nWith hand sowing, a measured area and an even spread matter more than a tally of bags emptied. An interruption or change of seed lot is worth marking where it happened.\n\n## Before the first bag is opened\n\n- Match the full variety and lot to the intended crop.\n- Keep the label, receipt and any test results together.\n- Prepare for the chosen method: nursery, direct sowing or drilling.\n- Separate lots during loading and equipment changes.\n- Keep treated seed out of food and feed, following its warnings.\n\n## Return after emergence\n\nThe next chapter is written in gaps, crowded stretches and patches that came through evenly. Compare several parts of the planting, including a typical stand and a weak area. Where appropriate, the condition of ungerminated seed may help an adviser investigate.\n\nUneven emergence leaves several possibilities open: seed, placement, moisture and soil condition. The saved label and the pattern in the ground give that investigation a better beginning.", "type": "Field Guide", "url": "/stories/seed-labels-and-sowing/", "tags": ["rice", "chana", "khapli-wheat", "seed-and-soil", "seed", "sowing", "label", "germination", "drill"]}, {"title": "Soil tests and fertiliser plans: sampling, units and context", "summary": "A soil report needs a representative sample and a clear field question. Test units, methods, previous inputs and root conditions shape its interpretation.", "text": "A laboratory can return a precise number from a small bag of soil. Its usefulness depends on where that soil came from. A sample mixed from a healthy stretch and a persistently wet corner may describe neither place well enough to explain the difference between them.\n\nThe first decision therefore happens before sampling: are we planning the next crop, investigating a weak patch or following a change over several seasons?\n\n## Begin in the field\n\nThe question shapes the sample. Areas with different soils, drainage or management histories may need to stay separate. The laboratory serving the region can advise on depth, timing, tools and handling for the crop and tests requested.\n\nMissouri Extension emphasises matching the report to the field, crop, sampling depth and relevant yield goal. Clean, suitable containers help avoid contamination; sampling immediately after fertiliser, manure or lime application can distort the result. Its principles belong alongside the procedures of the local laboratory. [1]\n\nA sample identifier linked to a simple private map preserves those choices. Next season, it should be possible to return to the same area and understand why it was sampled separately. The laboratory result then has a place in the field, rather than floating free of it.\n\n## Read the units and method\n\nParts per million describes a concentration. A recommendation per hectare describes an amount to apply over an area. These are different kinds of information, even when they sit beside each other on the same page.\n\nThe method matters too. “Low” and “high” are interpretations supported by a particular test and its research. Minnesota Extension explains that many soil nutrient results are index values indicating the likelihood of a crop response, rather than an inventory of every kilogram present or available to roots. [2]\n\nWhen comparing reports, put the analytical methods, units and sampling depths beside the numbers. An apparent change may need explanation before it becomes a reason to change the fertiliser programme.\n\n## Bring the season's history to the report\n\nThe soil has already received whatever went into the previous crop: manure, single-nutrient products and compound fertilisers. Product names, grades and amounts allow those contributions to be considered together. Bag weight alone cannot do that job.\n\nOur October banana archive shows how easily the picture can change. One component first called DAP was corrected to APS. The nutrient analyses differ, so the correction changes the account of what was supplied. It is a reason to reconcile the notebook with the product label, not a feeding programme for another planting.\n\n## Diagnose the growing conditions too\n\nRoots need access to what the soil contains. Standing water, restricted rooting or uneven delivery may help explain a pale or weak crop alongside its nutrient supply. Minnesota's compaction guidance describes how reduced pore space affects drainage, aeration and root growth. More fertiliser cannot by itself remove those physical constraints. [3]\n\n## From the report to the next operation\n\nA useful discussion with the adviser brings together:\n\n- The crop, growth stage and area covered by the sample.\n- The measurements, their interpretation and any unresolved problem.\n- Nutrients already supplied through fertiliser and manure.\n- Suitable product grades, placement, timing and field conditions.\n- What improvement to look for, and when to reassess it.\n\nThe final recommendation should explain why those choices fit this field. That reasoning is what makes the report useful again when the crop, weather or previous inputs change.", "type": "Field Guide", "url": "/stories/soil-tests-and-fertiliser-plans/", "tags": ["banana", "rice", "chana", "khapli-wheat", "seed-and-soil", "soil test", "sampling", "fertiliser", "nutrient", "report"]}, {"title": "Rice leaffolder damage: folds, larvae and fresh feeding", "summary": "An old feeding scar can remain after the caterpillar has left. Open representative folds and distinguish current activity from damage already done.", "text": "Inside a folded rice leaf, there may be a feeding caterpillar. There may also be nothing left but a white scar. From a distance, the two can look much the same. Opening a few folds begins to separate damage already done from feeding that is continuing.\n\n## What supports a leaffolder identification\n\nRice leaffolder caterpillars draw leaves together lengthways and feed from within. TNAU describes folded or webbed leaves, scraped green tissue and whitish dry feeding marks. A larva may be visible when the fold is opened. Severe damage can give a patch a pale, scorched appearance. [1]\n\nKerala Agricultural University adds details to look for: pale green, translucent larvae, feeding near young unopened leaves and faecal material. Finding several of these features together makes the identification stronger than a distant view of a damaged leaf. [2]\n\nA close photograph of the opened fold can show the feature that prompted concern. A whole-plant image and wider view add what the close-up leaves out: the crop's condition and how the damage is distributed. A scale helps make the insect's size understandable.\n\n## Separate old damage from current activity\n\nA white feeding scar can remain after a caterpillar has left. Counting scars alone may therefore overstate the insects feeding today. Live larvae, newly affected leaves and an expanding patch answer a different question from the amount of tissue already lost.\n\nMove beyond the field edge and the most conspicuous patch. Several representative places give a fairer picture of the crop. On a return visit, use the same approach so that a change in the count reflects the field rather than a different way of looking.\n\nPercentages need a denominator. “Ten damaged leaves out of a hundred examined” can be interpreted; an uncounted impression of “about ten per cent” carries a different degree of confidence. The definition of damage matters as much as the arithmetic.\n\n## The crop stage changes the question\n\nRice can recover from limited leaf feeding during vegetative growth. Leaf loss during reproductive development can have different consequences for grain production, as IRRI's plant-health publication explains. The stage of the crop therefore belongs beside the damage assessment. [3]\n\nTNAU also makes stage distinctions in its thresholds and calls for regular surveillance and consideration of natural enemies. A local rice adviser can identify the current sampling method and action threshold suitable for the crop and region. The number only makes sense with that context. [1]\n\n## The details that help an adviser\n\n- Variety as recorded and current growth stage.\n- Leaves examined and those meeting the definition of fresh damage.\n- Live larvae, photographs and other identifying features.\n- Whether activity is isolated, patchy or widespread.\n- Natural enemies seen and changes since the previous visit.\n\n## What happened in our season\n\nThe curated farm archive follows leaffolder observations and treatment work through September and October 2026. On 18 October, treatment of affected Sonam rice was reported complete. That confirms the operation in the reported crop; it does not demonstrate complete control, a yield benefit or treatment of every rice field.\n\nThe return visit still matters. Fresh activity assessed in the same way can show whether feeding continues after a response, even though the older white scars remain on the leaves.", "type": "Field Guide", "url": "/stories/rice-leaffolder-in-the-field/", "tags": ["rice", "crop-problems", "rice", "leaffolder", "leafroller", "folded", "damage", "larvae"]}, {"title": "Crop lodging: inspect fallen wheat, stems and roots", "summary": "Lodging describes a crop that has fallen from its upright position. It does not identify the cause or convert a fallen area into a yield-loss figure.", "text": "By 20 March 2026, about 10% of our Khapli was estimated to have lodged: stems had bent or fallen among the wheat still standing. Wind and unsettled weather were being watched, but the owner's account did not settle on a single cause.\n\nThe fallen area was visible. Explaining it required a closer look at the plants and the ground beneath them.\n\n## Start at the base\n\nLodging describes a crop's loss of its upright position. It does not identify the point of failure. A stem may be bent or broken, or the plant may have tilted near the soil surface. Those differences are easiest to see at the base of representative plants, both within and at the edge of a fallen patch.\n\nA wider photograph preserves the direction of the fall and the shape of the affected area. Close views can then show stems, roots or crowns and the condition of the soil. Pulling plants upright merely to tidy the view can obscure that evidence. If examination needs samples, an adviser can explain what to take and how to handle it.\n\n## Several factors can meet in one event\n\nWeather can trigger a fall in a crop whose structure has already made it vulnerable. Cornell's small-grain guidance discusses dense stands, high fertility and excessive nitrogen in relation to weaker lower stems and greater lodging risk. [1]\n\nThose are questions for the field history, not a verdict on a photograph. A fallen patch alone cannot establish that the crop was overfed. In our Khapli account, the watched weather and the estimated lodged area remain separate facts; the cause remains unresolved.\n\n## Timing matters as much as area\n\nWheat passes through tillering, stem growth, flowering and grain filling before maturity. Minnesota Extension's development guide helps place an event within that sequence. Heads and grain give the date its biological context. [2]\n\nTen per cent of an area lying over does not mean ten per cent of its yield has been lost. Plants can differ in the severity of the fall, the stage reached, the condition of their grain and how much harvest equipment can recover. A loss figure would need measurements from affected and standing areas.\n\n## Watch what changes afterwards\n\nThe fallen crop may dry differently. Michigan State's discussion of sooty mould notes that lodged wheat can retain moisture longer than standing grain. Darkened heads deserve examination, although colour alone cannot identify a disease or establish whether grain is suitable for use. [3]\n\nVisits after changes in weather or maturity can reveal whether the grain's condition is deteriorating. Suspect material should remain identifiable while an appropriate laboratory or local adviser explains what testing is needed.\n\n## Before harvest changes the scene\n\nThe details most easily lost once cutting begins are:\n\n- The patch boundaries and how the affected area was estimated.\n- The direction of the fall and any upright comparison area.\n- The point of stem failure, soil moisture and visible root or crown damage.\n- Crop stage and grain condition when the patch was first seen.\n- Harvest delays, method and separately measured recovery, where available.\n\nOur Khapli was later hand-cut and given further drying before threshing. Those choices belong to that harvest, rather than a rescue recipe for every lodged crop. They are part of the longer question raised by the fallen stems: how will this particular crop reach maturity and be brought in?", "type": "Field Guide", "url": "/stories/lodging-when-a-crop-falls/", "tags": ["khapli-wheat", "rice", "crop-problems", "lodging", "fallen", "wheat", "khapli", "stems"]}, {"title": "Uneven crop maturity: compare patches before harvest", "summary": "A field can contain several stages of ripening. Compare representative patches and grain or pods before treating one harvest date as suitable everywhere.", "text": "In our chana season, cutting began while some patches were still green. Roughly 50 plants had flowered and then produced fresh leaves and branches; elsewhere, unintended water from a burst irrigation pipe became part of the crop's history. A single harvest date could not explain what was happening across those plants.\n\n## Map the difference before explaining it\n\nThe first distinction is between adjoining crops with different histories and differences within the same crop. Variety and establishment date may explain why one stretch is ahead. A greener patch within an otherwise drying crop raises another set of questions.\n\nWalk through typical areas as well as unusually green or dry ones. A simple map can show whether the pattern follows low ground, an irrigation incident or an establishment gap. It gives the next visit a place to begin without deciding the cause in advance.\n\nLeaves are only part of the picture. In wheat, Minnesota Extension distinguishes flowering, grain filling and maturity as stages in a continuing sequence. Heads and grain help locate a plant within that sequence; a green canopy or one hard grain cannot represent the whole field. [1]\n\n## Chana can continue growing\n\nChickpea has an indeterminate growth habit: vegetative growth can continue after flowering begins. Montana State Extension explains that late rain can restart development, including flowering and seed set, and complicate harvest. A plant may therefore carry the signs of more than one stage at once. [2]\n\nThat biology offers a possible explanation to investigate in a green patch. It does not diagnose the roughly 50 plants in our story, whose fresh growth remained unexplained. Nor does the separate irrigation incident establish a common cause for every delayed plant. Following those areas separately preserves the differences that the season actually showed.\n\n## Separate maturity from drying\n\nThree decisions can arrive at different times: seed has finished filling, a chosen harvest method can handle it, and the harvested lot is dry enough for its intended storage. Drying can remove water from mature seed; it cannot complete growth that immature seed missed.\n\nMontana's chickpea guidance stresses seed colour, warns of green seed with early harvest and distinguishes harvest moisture from the lower moisture needed for longer storage. Its regional figures and machinery advice need local interpretation. Crop-appropriate inspection and measurement help an adviser decide how to handle the crop at hand. [2]\n\nPerfect uniformity also has a cost. Philippine Rice Research Institute guidance warns against waiting for every rice grain to ripen, because grain can be lost while the last portion catches up. The practical question is a suitable harvest window across the crop. [3]\n\n## Questions for the green patch\n\n- Is it still flowering, filling seed or drying down?\n- How do its seeds compare with those in a typical mature area?\n- Does its variety or establishment date differ?\n- Does the pattern follow a known change in water or ground conditions?\n- Could separate cutting preserve the identity of the different lots?\n\n## A harvest with several dates\n\nOur chana cutting began on 20 March 2026 and final threshing extended to 16 April. In Khapli, about 70% had been cut by 9 April, with further drying before threshing. These are accounts of staggered work, not recommended waiting intervals.\n\nKeeping the lots distinct lets those dates mean something: which crop was cut, which was still ripening, and what happened to each after it left the field.", "type": "Field Guide", "url": "/stories/uneven-crop-maturity/", "tags": ["chana", "khapli-wheat", "rice", "crop-problems", "maturity", "ripening", "uneven", "harvest", "chana"]}, {"title": "Banana leaf damage: inspect holes, spots and new growth", "summary": "Holes, spots and torn edges may have different causes. Leaf age, the whole plant and changes in new growth help frame an assessment.", "text": "A banana leaf can hold a hole, a brown spot and a torn edge in the same broad blade. Those marks may have different histories. Their position on the leaf, the age of that leaf and the plant around it help turn a striking close-up into something that can be assessed.\n\n## Begin with a description\n\nA mark on a newly emerging leaf raises a different question from one on an older, lower leaf. Its starting point matters too: tip, margin, spaces between veins or separate spots. Both surfaces, the midrib and leaf stalk help complete the view.\n\nThen step back. Is one plant affected, a short run of plants or much of the planting? Does the pattern follow an exposed edge, a wet patch or a recent operation? These are questions to investigate, rather than answers supplied by the photograph.\n\n## Read pattern without prescribing a nutrient\n\nTNAU’s banana nutrient guide describes different patterns associated with deficiencies, including older-leaf tip and margin changes in potassium deficiency and changes in young leaves in several other disorders. It also describes the use of soil and leaf analysis to confirm visual assessments. Symptoms can guide the investigation; they should not turn directly into a shopping list. [1]\n\nA growth comparison needs the same care. Our secondary archive reports smaller banana plants still producing active new leaves in early October 2026. Short height was an observation. It did not establish a specific deficiency, a permanent failure or a need to replace every shorter plant.\n\n## Spots need context too\n\nTNAU describes yellow Sigatoka lesions that develop pale centres and yellow surrounds, with spots sometimes joining into larger dead areas. Such descriptions help identify features worth photographing and sampling. They do not establish that a similarly coloured farm leaf has that disease. [2]\n\nUniversity of Florida guidance lists several possible banana stresses, including wind damage, cold injury, salt effects and leaf diseases. It is written for Florida, so its local risk profile and treatment instructions should not be transferred to another farm. Its broader lesson is useful: marks with different causes can share colour or shape. [3]\n\n## Follow the newest growth\n\nChoose a few representative plants for repeat photographs and keep their identities in a private notebook. Compare newly opened leaves with older marked ones. Record whether the mark is expanding, whether more leaves are involved and whether the plant is maintaining new growth.\n\nNew growth is useful evidence, but one healthy new leaf does not prove that every underlying problem has resolved. Equally, an old scar does not mean the damaging process is still active. A dated series helps separate those possibilities.\n\n## Build a useful diagnostic record\n\n- Whole plant and nearby plants, followed by both sides of an affected leaf.\n- Leaf age, mark shape, position and distribution.\n- Recent rain, irrigation and visible drainage conditions.\n- Product names and dates of recent operations, without assuming a causal link.\n- Changes in new growth and spread since the previous visit.\n\nSpread to more plants or a change affecting the growing centre calls for local crop assessment and advice on handling samples. The photographs and plant history can travel with that enquiry, while the possible explanations remain open until a diagnosis is supported.", "type": "Field Guide", "url": "/stories/reading-banana-leaf-marks/", "tags": ["banana", "crop-problems", "banana", "leaf", "leaves", "damage", "damaged", "holes", "spots", "marks"]}, {"title": "Plan a farm operation: readiness, progress and follow-up", "summary": "Define the job, the conditions needed to start and what completion means. Finishing the work and measuring its effect are separate records.", "text": "In the October banana archive, feeding, earthing-up, irrigation and rotavator work were four separate tasks. By 18 October, feeding and earthing-up were complete. Irrigation was continuing, while completion of the second rotavator pass remained unconfirmed. Calling all of it “banana work” would hide what still needed doing.\n\nA useful plan gives each operation a clear purpose, a starting condition and a recognisable finish.\n\n## Name the outcome\n\n“Irrigate the crop” leaves several questions unanswered. Which part needs water? What has rain already supplied? Can the water reach it? “Inspect blocked drainage after rain” sets a different job, even though both concern water.\n\nFAO's Farm Business School handbook connects diagnosis, planning, implementation and evaluation. Its action-planning and record-keeping sections offer a sequence that works at field scale: understand the problem, organise the requirements, carry out the work and assess the result. [1]\n\nIf the purpose is still uncertain, an inspection or advisory visit may be the next task. That gives the uncertainty somewhere to go before it turns into a treatment or an equipment booking.\n\n## Check readiness, not only the date\n\nThe planned day needs suitable crop, weather, ground and access conditions. Equipment and materials may be ready while the field is not.\n\nWet soil is particularly vulnerable to compaction. Minnesota Extension explains how machinery can reduce pore space and affect drainage and rooting. A pass that is possible for the tractor may still be poorly timed for the soil. The ground itself needs assessing before work begins. [2]\n\nOur banana archive gives two ordinary reasons for changing a plan: saturated soil delayed feeding in September, and later rainfall replaced a planned irrigation. Those decisions followed the field's changing condition. They do not supply fixed feeding or watering intervals for another planting.\n\n## Put the sequence in writing\n\nSome jobs depend on an earlier one; others can happen independently. If the operation covers several varieties or areas, that sequence may be at a different point in each. A first section finished is useful progress, but it should leave the remaining work visible.\n\nThe separate October banana task states show why this matters. Feeding and earthing-up could close while irrigation remained open. Their completion also could not confirm a rotavator pass for which the archive had no final report.\n\n## A compact operation card\n\n- Purpose, crop and the extent of work.\n- Planned window and conditions needed to start.\n- Earlier tasks, equipment and materials the work depends on.\n- Current state: planned, started, paused, partly complete or complete.\n- What was reached, what remains and what is needed next.\n\nFor a crop product, the current label and agreed crop-specific instructions belong with the operation. An old mixture in a notebook describes what happened then; it cannot settle the formulation, suitability or directions for a new season.\n\n## Close the task, then follow the crop\n\nCompletion answers whether the work was done. The crop's response answers whether it achieved its purpose. A finished spray does not yet show control, just as a completed cultivation pass does not show how long weeds will stay down.\n\nFAO's programme-planning guidance emphasises reviewing progress and adapting later plans to experience. [3] In the field, that means allowing for the return visit as well as the operation itself. The work can be finished today while its result is still developing.", "type": "Field Guide", "url": "/stories/planning-a-farm-operation/", "tags": ["banana", "rice", "chana", "khapli-wheat", "field-work", "operation", "plan", "task", "field work", "record"]}, {"title": "Mustard after sowing: emergence, seedbed and observation", "summary": "After sowing, inspect emergence and stand evenness before assigning a cause to gaps. Seed identity, surface condition and drainage belong together.", "text": "Mustard entered the farm notebook while rice and banana work were still continuing. The archive records planting in one area on 13 October 2026, with sowing across the recorded areas complete by 18 October. It is the start of a crop story whose next chapter belongs to the seedbed: emergence is not yet confirmed.\n\n## Start with the ground and the seed\n\nSmall seed makes the surface of the field important. KVK Anjaw's rapeseed–mustard guidance emphasises a fine, level seedbed and drainage. Those features give an inspection something concrete to consider: clods, uneven ground, trapped water and a route for water to leave. The wider regional package needs local interpretation rather than wholesale transfer to another climate. [1]\n\nThe seed identity matters just as much. “Sarso” is the name used in our farm archive, but its variety allocation is not confirmed there. A label and lot number would answer questions that the working crop name cannot. Sowing dates and methods also need to stay linked to the particular area planted.\n\n## Give emergence its own check\n\nOnce seedlings appear, the ordinary stretch is as useful as the weakest patch. Together they show how even the start has been. Gaps following a row, a low patch or crusted ground may point towards different investigations.\n\nCounting over the same measured distance or area makes a return visit easier to compare. The count should be interpreted against a locally suitable population target. Before choosing whether to reseed or thin, it helps to know whether seedlings are still emerging, plants are missing or the original spread was uneven.\n\nAn empty patch cannot settle that question on its own. Poor seed, placement, moisture, crusting and feeding damage remain possibilities until the ground and seedling condition have been examined.\n\n## Follow stages rather than a borrowed calendar\n\nLeaf growth, stem extension, flowering and pod formation give the season its next landmarks. TNAU organises mustard protection guidance by sowing, vegetative, flowering and fruiting stages. The changing headings are a reminder that what deserves attention changes with the crop. [2]\n\nWater and nutrient decisions also need the actual crop and current local advice. An ICAR–CRIDA advisory from November 2025 shows how agromet recommendations belong to named regions, recent rainfall and a defined forecast period. Its date is part of its meaning: it is historical context, not this season's forecast or a universal sowing window. [3]\n\n## Scout before naming a problem\n\nTNAU's monitoring guidance takes observations at several places and includes aphid monitoring. Live insects or colonies, chewing, missing tissue and spots deserve examination alongside their distribution across plants. A photograph showing the insect can answer more than one showing damage alone. [2]\n\nBeneficial insects belong in that picture too. A local identification and stage-appropriate action threshold help turn a sighting into a proportionate decision. Older online product tables cannot provide a standing spray schedule for a new crop.\n\n## The first month takes shape\n\nThe most useful additions to the sowing entry will be:\n\n- First observed emergence and comparable stand counts.\n- Moisture, drainage and any crusted or flooded patches.\n- Growth stage and the weeds growing alongside the crop.\n- Signs of active feeding, with the insect where it can be found.\n- Changes in gaps or crowding since the previous visit.\n\nFor now, our public account ends with sowing completed. A stand of seedlings, flowers and eventually a harvest will each need their own evidence before they become part of the story.", "type": "Field Guide", "url": "/stories/mustard-after-the-monsoon/", "tags": ["mustard", "seed-and-soil", "mustard", "sarson", "emergence", "seedbed", "sowing"]}, {"title": "When to harvest grain: maturity, moisture and handling", "summary": "Colour alone cannot establish harvest readiness. Examine representative grain or pods and arrange the work that must follow cutting.", "text": "A rice panicle can be straw-coloured while some of its lower grains still need attention. A wheat head may contain hard grain while another part of the field is further behind. The colour seen from the road narrows the question; examining the grain helps answer it.\n\nHarvest timing also depends on what will happen once the crop is cut. A ready field needs a route through transport, threshing and drying.\n\n## Maturity is more than colour\n\nIRRI's rice-harvesting manual combines indicators, including the proportion of ripened grains and grain moisture. Early cutting can collect immature grain. Late cutting increases exposure to shattering and other field losses. Between them lies a suitable window for the crop and the method used. [1]\n\nTNAU's harvesting guidance similarly pairs straw-coloured rice panicles with the condition of grains lower in the panicle. For wheat it includes hard grain and yellowing spikelets. Each crop has its own signs; “golden” is too broad a rule to carry the decision alone. [2]\n\n## Look across the field\n\nA handful from the most even stretch may be reassuring without being representative. A wet corner, shaded edge or later patch may have developed differently. Comparing them shows whether the decision concerns one fairly uniform lot or several areas that may need different handling.\n\nWithin a rice panicle, the upper and lower grains can also differ. Examine several heads or pods in several places. A local adviser or experienced operator can relate what they find to the harvest method and suitable moisture. A photograph can show grain condition and colour; it cannot supply a moisture reading.\n\nThis wider assessment is especially useful when cutting will take more than one day. The question is which part is ready to begin and how the later work will cope, rather than whether every plant has reached precisely the same point.\n\n## Ready to cut is not ready to store\n\nHarvest moisture and storage moisture serve different purposes. Grain can be ready to leave the field while still requiring drying before storage. The drying space, equipment and handling capacity therefore belong in the decision before cutting starts.\n\nPHilMech's rice guidance stresses prompt drying and the problems caused by incomplete or uneven drying. Excessive drying temperature can also fissure grain and reduce the proportion of whole kernels after milling. Speed and care have to work together. [3]\n\nArrange a clean receiving area, protection from rain and someone able to assess the lot's condition. Transport that brings grain in faster than it can be handled simply moves the waiting crop from the field to another place.\n\n## Before cutting begins\n\n- Identify the crop, variety or working name and area assessed.\n- Compare several representative heads or pods, including later patches.\n- Match crop condition to the intended harvest equipment and local advice.\n- Confirm access, forecast, transport, threshing and drying arrangements.\n- Keep differently harvested lots identifiable as they move through the work.\n\n## Give the first weight a stage\n\nA harvest weight may include moisture and material later removed. Cleaning takes out other material; drying takes out water. A smaller weight afterwards does not automatically mean that the same amount of grain has been lost.\n\nNaming the stage—cut plants, threshed paddy or cleaned grain—keeps the comparison meaningful. It connects the decision made in the standing crop with what eventually reaches the store.", "type": "Field Guide", "url": "/stories/harvest-ready-grain/", "tags": ["rice", "khapli-wheat", "food-and-harvest", "harvest", "maturity", "moisture", "cutting", "grain"]}, {"title": "Grain storage: separate drying, cleaning and inspection", "summary": "Cleaning removes unwanted material; drying removes moisture. Grain that looks clean or feels dry still needs assessment for its intended storage.", "text": "A newly filled sack may contain grain, pieces of stalk, empty husks, dust and more moisture than the lot should carry into storage. Each leaves in a different way. A sieve cannot dry grain, and a day of drying cannot remove every impurity.\n\nThe work between harvest and storage begins by separating those jobs.\n\n## Start with the condition of the lot\n\nPaddy, hulled wheat and cleaned kernels describe different material. The crop, harvest date and stage of the weight help establish what is being handled. Wet and dry lots also need to remain distinguishable: mixing them may produce a reassuring average while leaving a wetter portion within the batch.\n\nFAO's storage manual explains why cleaning matters. Impurities occupy space, while dust and broken grain can make storage more troublesome. Cleaning makes the lot easier to inspect as well as removing foreign material. It need not turn every small or light grain into a reject without considering what it is. [1]\n\nA sieve separates mainly by size. Winnowing separates according to how material moves in air. The clean-looking handful at the end may still be too damp for the storage intended for it.\n\n## Dry the inside, not just the surface\n\nWater has to move from within the kernel to its surface and then into the surrounding air. FAO describes the roles of temperature, humidity and airflow in that process. What feels dry outside is not necessarily dry throughout the grain or across the batch. [2]\n\nA suitable, correctly operated moisture meter or qualified testing service replaces guesswork with a measurement. The crop, storage system, climate and intended duration all affect the guidance needed. No single number of hours in sunshine can answer for every grain and setting.\n\nMeasurements from representative parts of the lot are more informative than one convenient handful. Keeping the method with the result also makes a later reading easier to interpret: was the grain changing, or was it measured differently?\n\n## Protect the work already done\n\nDrying is not permanent protection from moisture. Grain exchanges water with the surrounding air. IRRI's explanation of equilibrium moisture shows how previously dried paddy can regain it in humid conditions. Packaging and the store must suit that environment as well as the grain's starting condition. [3]\n\nWater entering through the building can undo the work more directly. Clean handling surfaces, suitable bags and maintained equipment help protect the lot as it moves. Access matters too: sacks at the back need to be reachable for inspection, even when the front row looks sound.\n\n## A store is a place to revisit\n\nFAO treats regular inspection and representative sampling as part of storage management. [1] Dampness, heating, insects or another unexpected change need attention while the lot can still be kept separate and assessed. Competent local advice is needed before using suspect material.\n\nThe label has a practical job throughout this period. It links the grain to its cleaning and drying dates, moisture measurements and quantity packed. When sacks are moved or grain is taken out, that identity should travel with the remainder.\n\nOlder and newer lots can then be followed on their own terms. The store holds the result of the harvest, but its condition keeps changing after the door has closed.", "type": "Field Guide", "url": "/stories/drying-cleaning-and-storing-grain/", "tags": ["rice", "khapli-wheat", "chana", "food-and-harvest", "grain", "drying", "cleaning", "storage", "moisture"]}, {"title": "Khapli wheat processing: dehulling, clean grain and flour", "summary": "Khapli is hulled wheat. Dehulling removes its covering; flour milling comes later, and the weights at those stages describe different material.", "text": "Our Khapli harvest still carried its husk when it was weighed. Between that sack and a sack of flour lay an extra operation: releasing the kernels from their covering. Understanding that step makes both the processing work and the change in weight easier to follow.\n\nPenn State describes emmer as a hulled wheat. The distinction is physical: the harvested material needs dehulling before the clean kernels can follow their next route into food. [1]\n\nICAR–IARI identifies emmer, or dicoccum wheat, with the name Khapli. This explains the terminology; it does not authenticate a particular farm seed lot. [5]\n\n## Hulls and bran are different layers\n\nThe hull is an outer covering removed during dehulling. Bran belongs to the edible kernel beneath it. Removing the hull does not, by itself, turn wheat into refined flour.\n\nResearch on traditional emmer and einkorn processing distinguishes glume removal from later food preparation. It also reports variation in processing yields. Equipment, the material entering the process and what is counted at the end all matter; an attractive recovery figure from another batch is not a promise for this one. [2]\n\nA useful sequence to ask a processor about is initial cleaning, dehulling, separation of loosened coverings and remaining unhulled material, then a check of the clean kernels. The exact arrangement depends on the equipment. Ask what leaves each stage and whether any material needs another pass.\n\n## What the farm's batch tells us\n\nThe owner-reported Khapli harvest was 510 kg of hulled material on 18 April. A later processing note, dated 10 June, records a 54 kg hulled batch producing 32.5 kg of clean grain.\n\nThat is a clean-grain recovery of about 60.2% for the recorded batch: 32.5 divided by 54. It describes that processing event. It is not the recovery of the entire 510 kg harvest, and it is not a flour yield. Applying it to every remaining sack would turn an observation into an assumption.\n\nA processor comparing those weights needs the same stage names: husk-covered material going in, clean kernels coming out. Flour would be the result of a later operation.\n\n## From kernels to flour\n\nA wheat kernel contains bran, germ and endosperm. Whole-grain flour retains these parts in the proportions found in the intact kernel; refining removes portions, including bran and germ. The words “dehulled” and “whole-grain” therefore describe different aspects of processing. [3]\n\nAsk the miller whether the flour will be wholemeal or sifted, whether anything will be blended into it, and how the batch will be identified. If comparing weights, record clean grain entering the flour mill separately from hulled material entering the dehuller. Keep the empty container weight out of both figures.\n\n## Questions worth carrying to the mill\n\n- What exactly has been weighed before processing?\n- Are unhulled pieces returned for another pass or included in a reject fraction?\n- Does the returned weight mean clean grain or finished flour?\n- Is bran retained, partly sifted or separated?\n- Can the returned bags be linked to the original batch?\n\nKhapli remains wheat and contains gluten. Its age, name or processing route does not make it gluten-free. Health Canada's wheat guidance includes emmer among wheat names and distinguishes wheat allergy from coeliac disease. [4] Understanding the extra layer is a processing lesson, not a health promise.", "type": "Field Guide", "url": "/stories/hulled-wheat-and-milling/", "tags": ["khapli-wheat", "food-and-harvest", "khapli", "emmer", "flour", "dehulling", "milling", "processing"]}, {"title": "Paddy to rice: husks, bran, milling and batch weights", "summary": "Paddy still carries its husk. Dehulling exposes brown rice; further milling removes bran. Variety and processing state answer different questions.", "text": "The owner’s 2025 Kala Namak account begins with seven sacks of paddy, 30 kg each. Some stayed as paddy; the rest was cleaned into rice. Between those two forms are the husk, the bran and decisions about what the kitchen will receive.\n\nFollowing those layers explains why a paddy weight and a rice weight describe different material.\n\n## Paddy, brown rice and milled rice\n\nIRRI's service laboratory sets out a clear distinction. Cleaning removes unfilled and partly filled material from a sample. Dehulling removes the hull, producing brown rice. Further milling removes bran from that brown-rice kernel to produce white or polished rice. [1]\n\nThe husk and bran are different layers. Removing the husk is necessary to expose the rice kernel; how much bran is then removed is another processing decision. Ask about that decision when arranging a batch, especially if the intended result is rice with its outer edible layers retained.\n\n“Brown rice” describes a processing state, not a particular variety. ICAR's rice research institute explicitly makes that distinction and notes that the outer grain layer may also be reddish or purple. A variety name and a milling description belong alongside each other on a useful label. [2]\n\n## A name does not tell the whole route\n\nParboiling is another distinction. IRRI describes it as processing rice with heat and moisture while the grain is still in its hull. It is separate from the degree of bran removal. Do not assume that a familiar variety name tells you whether a lot was parboiled or how heavily it was milled. [3]\n\nBefore using an unfamiliar batch, ask for the variety or working name, whether it was parboiled, and the milling description. These details give a better starting point for choosing a suitable cooking method than colour alone. Keep the supplier's or processor's instructions with the batch when they are available.\n\n## A small harvest, recorded carefully\n\nThe owner's account of the 2025 Kala Namak harvest records seven sacks of paddy at 30 kg each: 210 kg in all. Approximately 70 kg of paddy was retained; the rest was cleaned into rice.\n\nThose notes establish the harvest quantity and the decision to keep part as paddy. They do not give a paired input and output measurement for the milling batch. We therefore cannot calculate its milling recovery from them. A later amount remaining in storage would answer a different question from the amount first returned by the mill.\n\n## What to record at processing\n\n- Identify the variety and lot before bags leave the store.\n- Weigh the particular paddy batch sent for processing.\n- Agree whether the returned product should retain bran and whether it is parboiled.\n- Record rice returned, including whether whole and broken kernels are weighed together.\n- Note any by-products, rejects or material retained by the processor separately.\n\nWhole kernels and broken pieces can be separated during grading, as IRRI describes. [3] A weight for whole kernels alone therefore leaves part of the output out of the comparison. What returns from the mill needs a name as well as a number.", "type": "Field Guide", "url": "/stories/rice-from-paddy-to-plate/", "tags": ["rice", "food-and-harvest", "rice", "paddy", "brown", "white", "husk", "bran", "milling"]}, {"title": "Chana processing: whole chickpeas, dal and cleaning", "summary": "Whole chana and dal begin inside the same pod. Threshing, cleaning, drying and further milling are separate steps on the way to the pantry.", "text": "Whole chana and chana dal begin with the same crop inside a pod. The difference develops after harvest: seed is released and cleaned, then either kept whole or processed further. Following that work connects the crop in the field with the form used in a kitchen.\n\n## Read the pods, not only the date\n\nA chana crop can mature unevenly. TNAU's Bengal gram seed-production guidance uses the colour of the majority of pods as a harvest indicator. This is guidance for seed production under its stated conditions; it is a useful reminder to examine pods, rather than a universal harvest date or a food-storage prescription. [1]\n\nWalk through representative parts of the crop. Compare drier and later patches and open several pods to see the seed within. Record the unevenness. It gives context to a decision to wait or to organise harvesting in stages, even when the eventual notebook entry gives just one completion date.\n\nThe farm's owner described uneven chana maturity and irrigation-related delays before the recorded cleaned quantity reached 1,950 kg. That quantity belongs to cleaned chana. It does not establish the weight of whole plants, the original uncleaned lot or a dal-milling recovery.\n\n## Separate the jobs after cutting\n\nThreshing releases seed from harvested plants. Cleaning then removes pods, stalk pieces, dust and other foreign material. Drying addresses moisture. These names describe different jobs even when equipment combines some of them.\n\nA bag of clean chickpeas represents a different stage from a weight of whole plants. Water removed in drying and material removed in cleaning help explain the change. If wet and dry lots were combined, their histories also become part of the comparison.\n\n## Whole chana and dal\n\nTNAU's processing guidance describes pulse milling as a sequence involving cleaning, dehusking, splitting, separation and bagging. Removing the seed coat and splitting the seed produces dal. It also explains that repeated milling can produce broken material and fines, so a finished-dal weight is another distinct result. [2]\n\nBefore sending a lot to a mill, agree on the intended product. Ask whether whole seed, split dal, separated coat and smaller fractions will be returned or weighed separately. Keep food grain clearly distinguished from planting seed and retain any treatment information with seed lots.\n\n## Make the pantry easy to check\n\nFor food already prepared for dry storage, inspect the packaging and use clean, suitable, tightly closed containers. University of Minnesota Extension recommends checking stored foods for insects, keeping storage areas clean and using older supplies first. Its household advice includes dried beans and grain products. [3]\n\n- Label the crop, processing form and packing date.\n- Keep a new batch identifiable instead of repeatedly topping up an old one.\n- Look for insects, damaged packaging or other deterioration when using it.\n- If food is infested, follow the extension advice to discard it and inspect other susceptible supplies. [3]\n\nA plain pantry label—whole chana or chana dal, a source and a date—carries the harvest story into the kitchen.", "type": "Field Guide", "url": "/stories/chana-from-pod-to-pantry/", "tags": ["chana", "food-and-harvest", "chana", "chickpeas", "dal", "besan", "processing"]}, {"title": "Pulses in crop rotation: roots, residues and nitrogen", "summary": "Pulses can form nitrogen-fixing partnerships, but their contribution depends on conditions and what leaves in the harvest. There is no automatic fertiliser credit.", "text": "A harvested chana crop takes grain away from the field and may leave roots and other residues behind. Its place in a rotation depends on both: what leaves, what remains and what will grow next.\n\nRotation follows a sequence on the same ground. A pulse brings different biology into that sequence, without providing an automatic cure for soil problems or a fixed replacement for fertiliser.\n\n## The partnership at the roots\n\nLegumes can form a relationship with compatible rhizobia bacteria in root nodules. The bacteria make atmospheric nitrogen available to the plant; the plant supplies energy and a place for the bacteria to live. Saskatchewan's government guidance explains both this exchange and the need for the right bacterial partner for the pulse species. [1]\n\nThat relationship depends on conditions. Crop health, available soil nitrogen and the growing environment affect fixation. Simply seeing a pulse in the field does not tell us how much nitrogen it fixed. Buying an inoculant also does not demonstrate that an effective partnership developed.\n\nFor a practical decision, start with local advice, crop history and an appropriate soil test. A recommendation written for Canadian conditions explains the biology; its application rates and timings should not be copied into an Indian field.\n\n## Fixed nitrogen is not all left behind\n\nA pulse crop uses nitrogen in its own growth, including the grain that leaves at harvest. Roots and other residues may remain, but the following crop's benefit depends on what is retained, removed and decomposed.\n\nFAO's crop-production sourcebook discusses nitrogen balance in relation to inputs, harvested produce, residues and losses. That fuller accounting is more useful than assuming all nitrogen fixed by a crop becomes immediately available to the next one. [2]\n\nRecord residue handling alongside the grain harvest. A crop grown and incorporated as green manure is a different event from a grain crop harvested for food. The same word “legume” does not make their nutrient contributions interchangeable.\n\n## A change of crop can change other pressures\n\nUniversity of Minnesota Extension describes rotation as a way to consider weeds, insects, disease, fertility, soil structure and available moisture together. Different growth habits and work windows can also spread field tasks through the year. These are planning principles; its regional crop sequences are not a ready-made plan for this farm. [3]\n\nA break works best when the next crop is unsuitable for the problem being interrupted. Two different crop names may still share a disease or pest. Rotation therefore begins with identification and field history, rather than a promise that every cereal-to-pulse change will solve the same problem.\n\n## Build a useful rotation note\n\n- List the crops actually grown on each area in order, including failed or shortened crops.\n- Note sowing and harvest windows, drainage constraints and water availability.\n- Record diagnosed problems and persistent weeds, keeping suspicions separate.\n- Note grain removed and whether residues stayed, were incorporated or left the field.\n- Check the proposed next crop with locally relevant guidance before choosing seed or inputs.\n\nSeveral crops growing somewhere on a farm show diversity. A rotation follows what happened in succession on one area. That sequence is what lets a grower ask whether a change in crop helped interrupt a problem or simply moved it into another season.", "type": "Field Guide", "url": "/stories/pulses-and-crop-rotation/", "tags": ["chana", "rice", "khapli-wheat", "seed-and-soil", "pulses", "rotation", "chana", "nitrogen", "rhizobia"]}, {"title": "Farm calendars: Kharif, Rabi, crop stages and actual work", "summary": "Season names orient the year. Crop stage, local conditions and completed operations make a calendar useful for a particular field.", "text": "By 18 October 2026, the archived farm notes put several crops on different pages of the season. Navara red rice had been harvested. Mustard sowing was complete. Banana top-dressing and earthing-up were finished, but irrigation was continuing.\n\nOne date held a harvest, a beginning and work still under way. A farm calendar needs room for all three.\n\n## Start with the season, then add the place\n\nKharif, rabi and zaid give broad shape to the year in northern and interior India. The NCERT geography text relates kharif to the southwest monsoon, rabi to the winter cropping season and zaid to a shorter summer season between them. The names orient us without fixing identical sowing dates for every district. [1]\n\nFAO describes its crop calendar in relation to particular agroecological zones. Location gives a planting month its meaning: what suits one setting may be poorly timed in another. A general chart can help with preparation and local enquiries; the field still has to be ready for the operation. [2]\n\n## Follow what the crop is doing\n\nTwo crops sown in the same month may not develop at the same pace. Putting a stage beside a date makes the difference visible. “Sown”, “emerged”, “flowering” and “harvested” locate the crop more clearly than its age alone.\n\nTransplanted rice needs two beginnings kept apart: nursery sowing and the later move into the field. Otherwise, an age written in the notebook may count from an unknown starting point.\n\nFAO's rice guidance distinguishes nursery and vegetative periods, reproductive development and ripening. These stages change the context for water management. Its example durations explain the sequence; they do not turn it into a countdown valid for every variety and environment. [3]\n\nIf a crop appears late, stage and date together help frame the enquiry. Neither can establish on its own whether variety, weather or management caused the difference.\n\n## Give actual work its own line\n\nAn expected window helps arrange seed, equipment and people. A completed operation tells us what happened. Between them may be a start, a pause and several partly finished areas.\n\nThat distinction is visible in the October overlap. The mustard sowing milestone does not confirm emergence. The finished banana top-dressing does not finish its irrigation. Each new entry advances one part of the season, while another may remain open.\n\nThese are archived milestones from 2026, rather than a schedule for every future October. They offer a comparison for the next season: what happened earlier or later, and what was happening in the field at the time?\n\n## A calendar that can change\n\nFor each crop, leave room for:\n\n- Variety or working crop name and the area being followed.\n- Nursery sowing, direct sowing or planting, clearly distinguished.\n- Growth stages as they are actually seen.\n- Work planned, begun, paused and completed.\n- Weather or ground conditions that changed the timing.\n- Cutting, drying, cleaning and processing when they happen separately.\n\nA feeding date can remain a plan while wet soil delays the work. “Irrigation ongoing” can remain open until completion is known. Those unfinished lines are useful information for the next day's work.\n\nLeave space beyond cutting, too. Grain waiting to dry or be milled still needs time, equipment and storage. The crop's place in the calendar continues after its place in the field is empty.", "type": "Field Guide", "url": "/stories/understanding-the-farm-calendar/", "tags": ["rice", "chana", "khapli-wheat", "banana", "field-work", "calendar", "kharif", "rabi", "zaid", "season"]}, {"title": "Banana season: planting, leaf damage and early crop care", "summary": "Young plants, uneven growth and an infestation that brought us closer to the leaves. A photo story from a plantation still finding its way.", "text": "From the edge of the field, the banana planting looks orderly: rows of small plants, a pipe crossing the ground, trees beyond. Step closer and that single view breaks into many smaller stories. One plant is opening a broad leaf. Another is still short. A caterpillar sits beside a midrib. At the base of a larger plant, a small shoot is pushing up.\n\nThese views stay with establishment, before a bunch becomes the subject of the photograph. The small plants, their newest leaves and the ground around them carry the story.\n\n## First, a field of small plants\n\nThe farm notes place the main planting between 11 and 17 July 2026, after land preparation and levelling. Tissue-culture plants went into the field in stages. Irrigation and the first foliar-feeding round were recorded complete by 20 July, with a few washed-out or failed plants still needing replacement.\n\nIn the wide photographs, there is plenty of ground between the plants. The rows, the mounds around individual plants and the irrigation pipe are all easy to see. A young plantation has this open appearance: each plant is still a separate presence in the field.\n\n## Growth was not the same everywhere\n\nA whole-field photograph can make differences look small. The closer views bring them forward. Broad green leaves sit alongside smaller plants; one photograph shows a short plant with dark, curled leaves.\n\nIn early August, establishment checks had already recorded losses and replacement plants. Yet the smaller plants still carrying fresh leaves in October were a reminder that size alone was not the whole picture. The newest leaf mattered too.\n\n## The leaves brought us closer\n\nInfestation became part of the season’s story too. In one of the close-ups, a striped caterpillar is visible against the pale midrib of a banana leaf. Other photographs show openings through the leaf blade and missing tissue along an edge.\n\nThese are the details a view from the field boundary would miss. Looking at the leaf means noticing where the damage sits, whether an insect is still present and how the newer leaves compare. It also means looking beyond the most striking photograph. The presence of this caterpillar does not explain every hole, dark patch or curled leaf in the collection.\n\n## Water and weeds were part of the same season\n\nThe planting needed water during establishment, but the monsoon later brought another problem. In August, the notes recorded standing water and active drainage work. By early September, saturated ground delayed soil feeding while weed clearing continued around the plants.\n\nSeen against those notes, the ground in the photographs deserves as much attention as the leaves. Some views include grass and other growth around the planting; others show more exposed soil. \n\nThe work kept changing with conditions. By 18 October, the second top-dressing and earthing-up were recorded complete, while irrigation was continuing. The season was still under way.\n\n## Another leaf to follow\n\nTwo quieter photographs bring us back to growth: an upright leaf beginning to open, and a small shoot beside the pseudostem. They are details worth returning to, alongside the damaged leaves and weaker plants.\n\nFor now, the story stays with the growing crop: across the rows, down to the ground, and close enough to see what is living on a leaf.", "type": "Farm story", "url": "/stories/banana-learning-to-look/", "tags": ["banana", ""]}, {"title": "Banana insect activity: leaf photographs and the farm response", "summary": "A striped caterpillar, damaged leaves and a late-September response. What the banana photographs and dated notes tell us about an infestation.", "text": "The leaf fills the frame, but the first thing we notice is much smaller: a striped caterpillar beside its midrib. Elsewhere in the collection, openings run through a leaf blade and pieces are missing along an edge. An infestation, confirmed by the owner, had become part of the young plantation’s season.\n\n## One photograph, then a wider view\n\nA close-up preserves detail that can disappear in a walk down the row. A whole-plant view adds context: which leaves are affected, where the damage sits and how the plant is growing around it.\n\nTNAU’s banana crop-protection material describes several leaf-feeding pests with different signs and habits. It helps frame the inspection, but these photographs do not establish a species or a shared cause for every mark. Their capture dates are unverified, so they cannot be placed before or after a spray. [1]\n\n## The response in the notebook\n\nOn 29 September 2026, the farm record described insect activity on a few banana plants. A plantation-wide foliar nutrition and insecticide operation began that day and was reported complete on 30 September.\n\nThe entry records the response. Without matched pest counts or repeated views of the same leaves, it cannot tell us how well the operation worked. We also cannot confirm that the photographed caterpillar was the insect being targeted.\n\n## A season without a tidy ending\n\nThe next useful question is what changed in the plants. Repeated photographs of marked plants, fresh-damage notes and insect counts would help a future notebook answer it. Here, the record stops short of a measured result: the infestation was noticed and work followed. The leaves deserve another look.", "type": "Field case", "url": "/stories/banana-insect-activity-field-case/", "tags": ["banana", ""]}, {"title": "Banana waterlogging: drainage and delayed feeding decisions", "summary": "Water stood between young banana plants, and feeding had to wait. Follow the recorded decisions through a wet spell and the work that followed.", "text": "Young banana plants rise above pooled water. Between them, the ground has become part of the story. Before asking what to feed the crop, there is a more immediate question: what is happening around its roots?\n\nBy 20 August 2026, repeated rain had left water standing around the banana for about a week, and drainage work was underway. The undated archive photograph gives a view of wet conditions; the notebook supplies the chronology.\n\n## The work began with the ground\n\nBanana needs water, but continuously wet, poorly drained soil creates a different problem from a crop receiving an irrigation. UF/IFAS identifies flooding and poor drainage as risks for banana. RHS explains why saturated soil matters to roots: less air is available for them to function. [1, 2]\n\nThat helps explain the concern. There was no root assessment for the pictured plants, and the separate dated entries do not establish uninterrupted saturation through the weeks that followed.\n\n## Feeding moved with the weather\n\nOn 7 September, saturated conditions delayed soil fertiliser. Weed clearing continued, with foliar feeding described in the interim.\n\nThe first soil top-dressing began on 19 September and was reported complete across the plantation on 22 September. Irrigation was next on the job list. Two days later, rain made it unnecessary. The weather had changed the plan again.\n\n## The work continued into October\n\nOn 18 October, a later round of top-dressing and earthing-up was complete, with irrigation continuing. It was another step in the season, separate from September’s application.\n\nThe record tracks the work, rather than measuring root injury, nutrient loss or recovery attributable to drainage or feeding. Smaller plants may have had more than one difficulty to contend with.\n\n## A useful lesson to carry forward\n\nRain, ground conditions, feeding and irrigation could not be treated as independent boxes on a calendar. Each decision changed the next job. Recording how long water stands, how drainage progresses and how the same marked plants grow would make that sequence easier to understand in a future season.", "type": "Field case", "url": "/stories/banana-waterlogging-field-case/", "tags": ["banana", ""]}, {"title": "Khapli wheat lodging: fallen crop and later harvest decisions", "summary": "About a tenth of the Khapli was reported lodged. Hand cutting and further drying followed later in the season; the cause and yield loss remain unresolved.", "text": "Some of the field is still upright. Through it runs a swathe of wheat lying low, its stems bent across one another. It is a striking change in the canopy, and the kind of sight that invites a quick explanation.\n\nBy 20 March 2026, the owner estimated that about 10% of the Khapli crop had lodged. The undated photographs show fallen patches beside standing wheat. The estimate comes from the field account, rather than the area visible in either frame.\n\n## A flattened crop is the beginning of the question\n\nLodging describes a crop that can no longer remain upright. To understand a patch, we would look at where stems bend or fail, how roots sit in the soil and how the affected area lies across the field. Those details were not established here.\n\nCornell’s small-grain guidance identifies stand density, fertility and excessive nitrogen among lodging risks. These are questions to consider, not a diagnosis of this field. Nutrition, wind, irrigation, disease and cultivar weakness were not confirmed as its cause. [1]\n\n## The harvest had its own decisions\n\nThe crop was later cut by hand, with Khapli kept separate from other wheat. By 9 April, roughly 70% had been cut. Some grain felt hard, but the owner questioned whether part had been cut early. Cut stalks were left to dry further while the remaining crop stood for several more days.\n\nCrop stage still mattered after the canopy had changed. These harvest choices were not recorded as a rescue treatment for lodging.\n\n## Ten per cent lodged does not mean ten per cent lost\n\nOn 18 April, the recorded harvest total was 510 kg in hulled form. There was no separate yield measurement for lodged and upright areas, so that total cannot reveal the loss attributable to the fallen patch.\n\nAbout 10% describes the estimated lodged area. The 510 kg describes the hulled harvest; it is neither a flour yield nor a per-area productivity figure.\n\n## What the next notebook could add\n\nCloser stem-and-root views, crop stage, weather observations and separate measurements from affected and upright areas would help explain a future case. This season leaves us with a visible field change and a sequence of harvest choices. Its cause remains an open question.", "type": "Field case", "url": "/stories/khapli-lodging-field-case/", "tags": ["khapli-wheat", ""]}, {"title": "The seed drill", "summary": "A hopper, a row of tubes and a question of even delivery. Follow the journey from seed box to furrow.", "text": "The yellow drill in our archive makes the sowing process easier to picture. A box holds material above the ground; tubes lead towards the rows below. The accompanying film shows the tractor and implement moving across a prepared field. It records a moment of work, rather than proving the depth or quantity delivered.\n\n## A row begins above the soil\n\nA seed drill brings several jobs together: metering seed, carrying it down tubes and opening furrows. TNAU’s description of a tractor-drawn seed-and-fertiliser drill explains these components and the adjustment of seed delivery. A machine designed for both materials can keep them in separate compartments and delivery paths. The exact arrangement needs to be checked on the particular drill. [1]\n\nThe visible hopper does not tell us the selected rate, whether fertiliser was loaded, or how accurately the machine performed. Those belong in the operation record, alongside the crop, seed lot and measured area.\n\n## Settings need a check\n\nBefore sowing, a competent operator checks the manual, the intended crop and the actual seed lot. Calibration compares the amount delivered over a known test with the intended target. Tubes, outlets and openers also need to be clear and in working order. Field checks then look at distribution and placement; an empty hopper alone cannot establish even sowing.\n\n## What to notice in the film\n\nWatch the relationship between the tractor, the implement and the ground. A short view can show movement and the arrangement of equipment. To assess establishment, we must return later and look at the emerging rows.\n\nMachine adjustments and clearing blockages require safe isolation. Stop the drive, isolate the power and wait for movement to cease before approaching working parts; follow the machine’s instructions. [2]", "type": "Equipment", "url": "/equipment/seed-drill/", "tags": ["equipment", "tractor", "machinery"]}, {"title": "Working the soil", "summary": "What a tined implement does, and why a workable seedbed depends on more than another pass.", "text": "Behind the tractor, the blue frame carries a series of downward-facing tines. This is the working end of cultivation: the points meet the soil while the frame keeps their arrangement. The photograph lets us see the implement, but does not establish its working depth or the condition of the whole field.\n\n## Tines, clods and a seedbed\n\nTNAU describes cultivators used in seedbed preparation to loosen soil and break clods. Suitable arrangements can also be used for inter-row work. That does not make every cultivator suitable for every standing crop: spacing, clearance, depth and the crop’s roots all matter. [1]\n\nThe tractor supplies movement and carries or draws the implement. The result depends on the soil as well as the machine. A fine-looking surface can conceal compacted ground beneath, so the next question is whether the rooting zone and drainage are suitable for the crop.\n\n## Decide what the pass is for\n\nName the job before choosing the implement. Is the aim to prepare a seedbed, manage weeds between rows, incorporate material or correct a specific surface condition? Each needs a different assessment. An extra pass is an operation with a cost and an effect on the soil, rather than an automatic improvement.\n\nThe farm archive distinguishes work such as rotavator passes and levelling. Keep those operations separate in a field history; one does not prove that another was completed.\n\n## A useful record\n\nKeep the implement, purpose, soil condition and area with the date. After the pass, inspect several places rather than only the headland. Before adjustment or work beneath raised equipment, isolate the machine and secure it according to its instructions. Hydraulic lift alone is not a safe support. [2]", "type": "Equipment", "url": "/equipment/cultivator/", "tags": ["equipment", "tractor", "machinery"]}, {"title": "Separating grain from the crop", "summary": "Threshing, cleaning and the grain that still needs another look before storage.", "text": "The standing crop and a pile of grain are separated by several kinds of work. In the equipment archive, housings, outlets and collection points show part of that journey. A photograph of the output is not a measurement of cleanliness, moisture or recovery.\n\n## Threshing is one stage\n\nThreshing separates grain from the ears or pods that hold it. TNAU’s multi-crop thresher description explains a drum-and-concave mechanism, with sieves and air used to separate lighter material. Machines differ in their design and crop suitability, so settings must come from the relevant manual and a competent operator. [1]\n\nThe crop’s condition and the way it is fed into a machine affect the job. Excessive unthreshed material, damaged grain or losses at the outlet are reasons to stop and assess the process. They are not problems to solve by reaching into a running machine.\n\n## Follow each lot\n\nKeep varieties and batches identifiable through drying, threshing, cleaning and storage. Weighing at a named stage makes comparisons more meaningful. Our Khapli story distinguishes hulled grain from cleaned grain; those weights describe different material and should not be presented as interchangeable.\n\n## The work after the outlet\n\nGrain may still need cleaning, moisture assessment and suitable drying before it can be stored. A trailer load can include grain and other material in proportions that a wide photograph cannot measure. The food and harvest guides follow these later steps.\n\n## Keep clear of moving parts\n\nGuards, safe feeding arrangements and a clear working area matter. Before clearing, servicing or adjusting, fully isolate the power and wait for motion to stop. Engine shut-down alone may leave stored energy or moving parts; use the machine’s full isolation procedure. [2]", "type": "Equipment", "url": "/equipment/thresher/", "tags": ["equipment", "tractor", "machinery"]}, {"title": "Getting water to the field", "summary": "The motor and pump are part of a larger system: source, lift, pipework and the field that receives the water.", "text": "This photograph shows an electric motor coupled to a pump. It gives the irrigation story a tangible starting point. The motor drives the pump, but the field’s water supply depends on much more than the equipment standing on the floor.\n\n## Think in systems\n\nWater has to travel from a source to an outlet. The vertical lift, pipe length, friction and required delivery all influence the work a pump must do. FAO’s irrigation-pumping guidance explains the relationship between flow, total head and power. A motor rating alone cannot tell us the volume reaching a particular field. [1]\n\nThat is why a pump cannot be selected from a photograph. Source conditions, seasonal water levels, the delivery route and the intended use need to be assessed together. The visible assembly does not establish horsepower, discharge, energy use or suitability for a particular crop.\n\n## Pump time is not water depth\n\nA record of hours helps us understand an operation, but turning it into an applied depth requires a measured flow and the area actually irrigated. Leaks, diversions and uneven distribution can change what reaches the crop.\n\nThe farm notes also show why irrigation is a field decision. Rain made watering unnecessary at one point in the banana season, while later records describe irrigation continuing. Neither entry supplies a fixed interval for another field.\n\n## Follow the water\n\nUseful observations include the source, start and stop times, measured delivery where available, distribution and the field’s response. Check the receiving soil and drainage as well as the outlet.\n\nAn electric pump belongs in a properly installed and maintained electrical system. Keep clear of exposed wiring and moving couplings; isolate power before inspection or maintenance, using a qualified person where needed. [2]", "type": "Equipment", "url": "/equipment/irrigation-pump/", "tags": ["equipment", "tractor", "machinery"]}, {"title": "The tractor and the ground beneath it", "summary": "Power matters. So do traction, soil condition, the implement and knowing when to wait.", "text": "The tractor is the most recognisable machine in many farm pictures. Its job changes with the implement behind it: preparing soil, sowing, carrying a load or supplying power to another operation. The attachment and the field condition are as important to the story as the tractor itself.\n\n## Match the whole operation\n\nTNAU’s cultivator description separates the implement’s soil-working role from the tractor that carries it. The implement, rather than the tractor model alone, tells us what work was intended. The completed result still needs a field check. [1]\n\nA useful record therefore names the implement, purpose, area, conditions and observed result. Record a contractor’s completed pass separately from a booking or a plan. Field work that was requested may still be waiting on weather or access.\n\n## When the ground changes the decision\n\nThe wet-ground photograph shows standing water and wheel tracks. It documents surface conditions in that view; it cannot establish the depth or extent of compaction. Minnesota Extension explains that traffic on wet soil increases compaction risk, and that compaction can restrict pores, roots and water movement. [2]\n\nThat makes timing part of machine management. Assess whether the soil is fit for the intended operation and whether a pass can wait. A photograph alone cannot determine safe access, traction or bearing strength.\n\n## Before work begins\n\nA competent operator checks the machine and implement, the route, people nearby and the manufacturer’s instructions. Secure attachments and loads correctly, keep passengers out of unsuitable positions and retain guards. Before adjustment or maintenance, stop and fully isolate the machine. [3]\n\nThe most useful question is often simple: what needs to happen in this field today, and are the conditions right for the machine to do it?", "type": "Equipment", "url": "/equipment/tractor-and-ground/", "tags": ["equipment", "tractor", "machinery"]}, {"title": "Banana", "summary": "A young plantation and the care that continues as the seasons change. Explore planting material, establishment and notes from our farm.", "text": "A young plantation and the care that continues as the seasons change. Explore planting material, establishment and notes from our farm. {\"botanicalName\": \"Musa spp.\", \"kind\": \"Perennial fruit crop · a large herb, not a woody tree\", \"season\": \"A long growing cycle spanning seasons; planting and harvest timing depend on variety and local conditions.\", \"opening\": \"A banana planting begins with individual plants and open ground between the rows. As new leaves unfold, the canopy grows and the work changes: establishment, water, weeds, nutrition, then the flowering stalk and developing bunch. What looks like a trunk is a pseudostem made from tightly wrapped leaf sheaths. Below ground, the rhizome produces roots and new shoots, allowing another generation to follow the fruiting plant. On this farm, the 2026 story stays close to the young leaves and the ground around them. Understanding how the plant grows helps explain why that quieter care matters long before a bunch appears.\", \"stages\": [{\"title\": \"Settling into the field\", \"text\": \"A young plant begins extending roots into the surrounding soil while fresh leaves emerge from its centre. Establishment depends on moisture reaching those roots without leaving them in stagnant water. This is also the time to replace confirmed planting losses.\"}, {\"title\": \"Building the canopy\", \"text\": \"Each rolled central leaf opens into a broad blade, while overlapping leaf sheaths build the pseudostem. The expanding canopy captures light to support growth. Weeds, dry ground and poor drainage can all make this early work harder for the plant.\"}, {\"title\": \"Flowering and filling a bunch\", \"text\": \"The flowering stalk rises through the pseudostem. Groups of flowers develop into hands—the clusters of fruit on a bunch—and individual fruits are the fingers. As the fingers fill, their shape becomes fuller and the bunch becomes heavier.\"}, {\"title\": \"Harvest and the next generation\", \"text\": \"Fruit is harvested at a maturity suited to its journey and intended use, then continues towards eating ripeness. Each fruiting pseudostem carries one bunch. A selected follower shoot growing from the rhizome can carry the next crop.\"}], \"care\": [{\"title\": \"Moisture without trapped water\", \"text\": \"Young roots need reliable moisture, while a growing canopy and filling bunch increase the plant’s demand. Match irrigation to rain, soil and crop development. Keep outlets open so supplying water does not leave the root zone saturated.\"}, {\"title\": \"Feed the growing plant through the soil\", \"text\": \"Banana develops a large leaf canopy and later fills a heavy bunch. Base nutrient supply on soil conditions, crop stage and local advice, accounting for earlier inputs. Root access and drainage matter alongside the nutrients in the bag.\"}, {\"title\": \"Make room for the crop\", \"text\": \"Weeds compete with young plants before their canopy shades the ground. Clear around the crop with care for shallow roots, and plan work between rows to suit the available space. Later, follower selection and bunch support become distinct jobs.\"}], \"farm\": {\"season\": \"Recorded season · May–October 2026\", \"summary\": \"Land preparation led to a July planting, followed by establishment checks, wet-weather delays and continuing care. These are historical milestones. A bunch harvest and measured crop outcome are not established in the retrieved record.\", \"events\": [{\"date\": \"2026-06-10\", \"label\": \"Ground prepared\", \"text\": \"Land levelling for the banana planting was reported complete.\"}, {\"date\": \"2026-07-17\", \"label\": \"Main planting complete\", \"text\": \"The main tissue-culture planting was reported complete after phased work that began on 11 July. Reserve plants were retained for establishment losses.\"}, {\"date\": \"2026-09-07\", \"label\": \"Wet ground changed the work\", \"text\": \"Saturated soil delayed soil feeding.\"}, {\"date\": \"2026-10-13\", \"label\": \"A product correction retained\", \"text\": \"The second feeding round began. A follow-up corrected the recorded phosphate component from DAP to APS 20:20:0:13.\"}, {\"date\": \"2026-10-18\", \"label\": \"Two jobs complete, water still underway\", \"text\": \"The second top dressing and earthing-up were reported complete. Irrigation was still underway; this entry did not close every other field task.\"}]}, \"issues\": [{\"title\": \"A marked or torn leaf\", \"text\": \"Record the leaf’s age, both surfaces and the pattern across plants. An insect on one leaf does not explain every hole or dark patch in a collection of photographs.\", \"guide\": \"reading-banana-leaf-marks\"}, {\"title\": \"Standing water and uneven growth\", \"text\": \"Look at drainage, the root environment and recent rain before treating slow growth as a nutrient problem. A wet patch and a small plant are observations to investigate together.\", \"guide\": \"waterlogging-and-roots\"}, {\"title\": \"Feeding without a clear baseline\", \"text\": \"Reconcile product labels and previous inputs before planning another round. Leaf colour alone cannot prescribe a fertiliser or establish the cause of weak growth.\", \"guide\": \"soil-tests-and-fertiliser-plans\"}], \"food\": {\"text\": \"The fruit’s journey continues after bunch harvest: careful handling and ripening shape when it is ready to eat. Dessert bananas and cooking types have different uses. The variety and harvest of this planting need their own records before we can tell a farm-to-kitchen story.\", \"guide\": null}, \"readings\": [\"banana-learning-to-look\", \"tissue-culture-banana\", \"reading-banana-leaf-marks\", \"understanding-npk\"], \"sources\": [{\"title\": \"University of Florida IFAS · Banana plant structure and development\", \"url\": \"https://ask.ifas.ufl.edu/publication/MG040\", \"accessed\": \"2026-10-24\"}, {\"title\": \"National Horticulture Board · Banana planting, aftercare and harvest\", \"url\": \"https://nhb.gov.in/report_files/banana/BANANA.htm\", \"accessed\": \"2026-10-24\"}, {\"title\": \"TNAU · Banana nutrition and symptom assessment\", \"url\": \"https://agritech.tnau.ac.in/expert_system/banana/Nutrientmgmt.html\", \"accessed\": \"2026-10-24\"}]}", "type": "Crop profile", "url": "/crops/banana/", "tags": ["banana"]}, {"title": "Rice", "summary": "From tillering and flowering to harvest, follow the changes in a rice field and get to know the questions behind a variety name.", "text": "From tillering and flowering to harvest, follow the changes in a rice field and get to know the questions behind a variety name. {\"botanicalName\": \"Oryza sativa\", \"kind\": \"Annual cereal · the harvested grain begins as paddy\", \"season\": \"Kharif in the recorded 2026 farm season; rice calendars vary with the variety, establishment method and region.\", \"opening\": \"A rice field is made of plants at work on several levels: roots in the soil, tillers rising from the base and, later, panicles carrying the grain. The route into that field matters. Nursery-raised seedlings transplanted later begin differently from directly sown rice, where seed germinates in the main field. Then the green canopy changes again: stems lengthen, panicles emerge and soft grain gradually hardens. Our 2026 notes follow several rice crops through that changing landscape. There is water to manage, competition between the plants and weeds, and a harvest decision that becomes clearer only when you look inside the panicle.\", \"stages\": [{\"title\": \"Seed to an established stand\", \"text\": \"A germinating seed sends out its first root and shoot. Seedlings may grow first in a nursery before being moved into the field, or establish where they were directly sown. The young crop needs suitable moisture and room to take hold.\"}, {\"title\": \"Leaves and tillers\", \"text\": \"Rice produces basal shoots called tillers, turning a small stand into a fuller canopy. Leaves supply energy for growth while roots explore the soil. Weed competition during establishment can leave the crop struggling to build that canopy.\"}, {\"title\": \"Booting, heading and flowering\", \"text\": \"The developing panicle swells within the upper leaf sheath—the boot—before emerging at heading. Its small flowers open and release pollen. Successful flowering sets up the next stage, when the developing grains become the crop’s main destination for growth.\"}, {\"title\": \"Milk, dough and hard grain\", \"text\": \"Grain contents begin watery, turn milky, then thicken through soft and hard dough as the grain fills. The crop loses green colour as it ripens. Harvest readiness combines grain development across the field with moisture and the intended harvest method.\"}], \"care\": [{\"title\": \"Control water through the season\", \"text\": \"Field levels, bunds, inlets and outlets shape where water goes. Establishment method and crop stage change the requirement; flowering deserves particular attention to avoiding water shortage. Heavy rain may make drainage the immediate job even in a rice crop.\"}, {\"title\": \"Give rice a head start over weeds\", \"text\": \"Clean seed, a well-prepared field and timely weed removal reduce competition for light, nutrients and water. Direct-sown rice and weeds may emerge together, while transplanted seedlings begin with a size advantage. Wild or volunteer rice needs its own close inspection.\"}, {\"title\": \"Balance feeding with crop protection\", \"text\": \"Use crop-appropriate nutrient advice rather than feeding to obtain the darkest possible canopy. Excess nitrogen can favour leaffolder problems. Scout for fresh feeding and live larvae, especially as the upper leaves support flowering and grain filling.\"}], \"farm\": {\"season\": \"Recorded season · June–October 2026\", \"summary\": \"Nursery sowing, direct broadcasting and transplanting overlapped. Navara reached a reported harvest while work continued in other rice. The archive records operations and observations, rather than a measured comparison of variety performance.\", \"events\": [{\"date\": \"2026-06-23\", \"label\": \"A nursery sown\", \"text\": \"Cleaned Vishnu Bhog seed was broadcast in the nursery. An earlier planned date had shifted.\"}, {\"date\": \"2026-07-13\", \"label\": \"A direct-sown crop\", \"text\": \"A separate rice crop recorded as 1718 was broadcast directly, rather than transplanted.\"}, {\"date\": \"2026-08-03\", \"label\": \"A transplanting milestone\", \"text\": \"Vishnu Bhog transplanting, begun in late July, was reported complete. This was not a completion report for every variety.\"}, {\"date\": \"2026-10-18\", \"label\": \"Navara harvested\", \"text\": \"Navara red rice was reported harvested. Harvest weight, drying, threshing and yield figures were not supplied in that update.\"}, {\"date\": \"2026-10-20\", \"label\": \"A removal task finished\", \"text\": \"The owner’s journal records manual wild-paddy removal in 1718 as complete. That milestone belongs to that crop and task.\"}]}, \"issues\": [{\"title\": \"Folded leaves and pale feeding marks\", \"text\": \"Open representative folds and look for live larvae and fresh feeding. Record the crop stage and extent before deciding whether a current problem needs action.\", \"guide\": \"rice-leaffolder-in-the-field\"}, {\"title\": \"Wild or volunteer rice in the crop\", \"text\": \"Keep the affected variety and progress clear. Removal completed in one crop does not close an ongoing task elsewhere, and a local weed name does not establish a botanical identification.\", \"guide\": \"weeds-and-the-work-between-rows\"}, {\"title\": \"A field that ripens unevenly\", \"text\": \"Compare panicles across representative places. The greenest patch and the driest edge are each only part of the harvest decision.\", \"guide\": \"uneven-crop-maturity\"}], \"food\": {\"text\": \"Paddy is rice grain still enclosed in its husk. Removing the husk produces brown rice; further milling removes bran layers to make white rice. Variety, processing and handling all shape what reaches the kitchen, so a field name alone does not describe the finished grain.\", \"guide\": \"rice-from-paddy-to-plate\"}, \"readings\": [\"reading-rice-development\", \"rice-varieties-and-names\", \"rice-leaffolder-in-the-field\", \"rice-from-paddy-to-plate\"], \"sources\": [{\"title\": \"IRRI · The rice plant and its ecology\", \"url\": \"https://books.irri.org/9789712201721_content.pdf\", \"accessed\": \"2026-10-24\"}, {\"title\": \"FAO · Paddy rice growth phases and water management\", \"url\": \"https://www.fao.org/4/t7202e/t7202e07.htm\", \"accessed\": \"2026-10-24\"}, {\"title\": \"IRRI Service Laboratories · Rice grain and milling terminology\", \"url\": \"https://isl.irri.org/services/rice-plant-grain-and-soil-physico-chemical-analyses/rice-grain-sample-prep-submission-guide\", \"accessed\": \"2026-10-24\"}, {\"title\": \"TNAU · Rice leaf folder identification and surveillance\", \"url\": \"https://agritech.tnau.ac.in/expert_system/paddy/cppests_lf.html\", \"accessed\": \"2026-10-24\"}, {\"title\": \"TNAU · Rice booting, flowering and milk-to-dough grain development\", \"url\": \"https://agritech.tnau.ac.in/expert_system/paddy/faqs.html\", \"accessed\": \"2026-10-24\"}]}", "type": "Crop profile", "url": "/crops/rice/", "tags": ["rice"]}, {"title": "Chana", "summary": "Three varieties, uneven ripening and a harvest taken in stages. Follow our Rabi 2025–26 chana season through photographs, films and field notes.", "text": "Three varieties, uneven ripening and a harvest taken in stages. Follow our Rabi 2025–26 chana season through photographs, films and field notes. {\"botanicalName\": \"Cicer arietinum\", \"kind\": \"Annual pulse · chickpea or Bengal gram\", \"season\": \"Rabi in the recorded 2025–26 farm season; a cool-season crop whose progress depends on variety and weather.\", \"opening\": \"Chana brings the field down to a smaller scale: divided leaves, pale flowers and pods tucked among branching stems. The plant can keep making fresh growth after flowering begins, so flowers, filling pods and older pods may overlap. That makes a close walk more useful than judging the whole crop by colour from the boundary. In our Rabi 2025–26 season, three recorded varieties were kept separate through a harvest that unfolded over several weeks. The story connects the living crop with cutting, drying, threshing and cleaning—and leaves room for the patches whose behaviour we could not fully explain.\", \"stages\": [{\"title\": \"Roots, leaves and branches\", \"text\": \"The seedling develops a taproot, lateral roots and a branching stem with small leaflets. Compatible soil bacteria can form nodules on its roots and help supply nitrogen. Good establishment gives the plant a foundation for its later flowers and pods.\"}, {\"title\": \"Flowering among new growth\", \"text\": \"Pale flowers appear along the branches while the plant can continue making leaves and shoots. Chana’s indeterminate growth means flowering and vegetative growth can overlap. Late favourable moisture may encourage another flush instead of the whole crop drying together.\"}, {\"title\": \"Pods begin to fill\", \"text\": \"Small pods form after flowering and their seeds expand. Open representative pods to see the difference between a developed outer pod and a filled seed. Plants and branches that flowered at different times may still be at different stages.\"}, {\"title\": \"Ripening, cutting and threshing\", \"text\": \"Pods and seed change towards their mature colour as the crop dries. Cutting may proceed in stages where maturity differs. Further drying allows threshing to release the grain, followed by cleaning before storage or processing.\"}], \"care\": [{\"title\": \"Protect the root environment\", \"text\": \"Chana favours well-drained ground and tolerates waterlogging poorly. Plan irrigation around soil moisture and development rather than treating every green patch as thirsty. Fixing a leak can matter as much as providing a planned watering.\"}, {\"title\": \"Support nodulation and soil fertility\", \"text\": \"Chana’s relationship with compatible bacteria can supply part of its nitrogen need, but it does not remove the need for fertile soil. Where inoculation is advised, the product must suit chickpea. Soil testing helps identify other nutrient needs without assuming every pulse feeds itself.\"}, {\"title\": \"Reduce competition and follow the pods\", \"text\": \"Young chana leaves room for weeds between its branches. Timely removal reduces competition before flowering and pod filling. As harvest approaches, compare pod and seed development across the field so an unusually green patch does not dictate the treatment of everything around it.\"}], \"farm\": {\"season\": \"Recorded season · Rabi 2025–26\", \"summary\": \"Daftari, Pusa Manav and Pusa 362 were followed through staged cutting and threshing. A small patch resumed leafy growth after flowering with its cause unresolved; unintended irrigation affected other patches. The final weight is a cleaned-grain total, not a per-area yield.\", \"events\": [{\"date\": \"2026-03-20\", \"label\": \"Manual cutting began\", \"text\": \"Cutting started on mature chana in one field.\"}, {\"date\": \"2026-03-30\", \"label\": \"Harvest still uneven\", \"text\": \"One field had been cut; the other was about 60% complete. Two plots remained green after unintended irrigation.\"}, {\"date\": \"2026-04-01\", \"label\": \"A major threshing round\", \"text\": \"The first major threshing covered the first field and part of the second, after the cut plants had dried.\"}, {\"date\": \"2026-04-16\", \"label\": \"Final threshing reached\", \"text\": \"The final lot had been threshed by this date. Cleaning and winnowing followed.\"}, {\"date\": \"2026-04-18\", \"label\": \"Cleaned grain counted\", \"text\": \"The recorded cleaned-grain total was 1,950 kg across the three varieties. Planted area by variety is needed before comparing yields.\"}]}, \"issues\": [{\"title\": \"Green plants beside a mature crop\", \"text\": \"Compare pods and seeds, and trace the patch’s water and establishment history. Regrowth is possible, but the cause of the farm’s unusual flowering-then-leafy patch was not confirmed.\", \"guide\": \"uneven-crop-maturity\"}, {\"title\": \"An unclear journey into storage\", \"text\": \"Label lots through cutting, drying, threshing and cleaning. A finished threshing job does not establish that grain is ready for its intended storage conditions.\", \"guide\": \"drying-cleaning-and-storing-grain\"}], \"food\": {\"text\": \"Chana can be kept as whole grain or processed into split dal and flour. These are different forms of the same crop, with cleaning, dehusking and splitting among the possible steps. Our season’s 1,950 kg record refers to cleaned grain before any later dal or flour recovery is measured.\", \"guide\": \"chana-from-pod-to-pantry\"}, \"readings\": [\"chana-a-season-in-stages\", \"uneven-crop-maturity\", \"chana-from-pod-to-pantry\", \"pulses-and-crop-rotation\"], \"sources\": [{\"title\": \"Montana State University Extension · Chickpea botany, growth habit and harvest\", \"url\": \"https://extension-store.montana.edu/montguides/chickpea-production\", \"accessed\": \"2026-10-24\"}, {\"title\": \"TNAU · Bengal gram development and harvest\", \"url\": \"https://agritech.tnau.ac.in/seed_certification/seed_pul_bengalgram.html\", \"accessed\": \"2026-10-24\"}, {\"title\": \"TNAU · Pulse processing and dal milling\", \"url\": \"https://agritech.tnau.ac.in/postharvest/pht_pulses_processing.html\", \"accessed\": \"2026-10-24\"}, {\"title\": \"Government of Saskatchewan · Pulse nodulation and nitrogen fixation\", \"url\": \"https://www.saskatchewan.ca/business/agriculture-natural-resources-and-industry/agribusiness-farmers-and-ranchers/crops-and-irrigation/soils-fertility-and-nutrients/inoculation-of-pulse-crops\", \"accessed\": \"2026-10-24\"}]}", "type": "Crop profile", "url": "/crops/chana/", "tags": ["chana"]}, {"title": "Khapli wheat", "summary": "Young leaves, tall heads, a hand-cut harvest and an extra processing step. A visual account of our Rabi 2025–26 Khapli season.", "text": "Young leaves, tall heads, a hand-cut harvest and an extra processing step. A visual account of our Rabi 2025–26 Khapli season. {\"botanicalName\": \"Triticum turgidum subsp. dicoccum\", \"kind\": \"Annual cereal · emmer, a hulled wheat\", \"season\": \"Rabi in the recorded 2025–26 farm season; harvest and processing continued into spring and early summer.\", \"opening\": \"Khapli is emmer wheat, a hulled wheat whose grain remains enclosed after ordinary threshing. That one difference extends its story beyond the standing crop: cutting and drying are followed by threshing, then dehusking before the cleaned grain can be milled. Our Rabi 2025–26 season included tall heads, patches of fallen stems and a hand harvest taken in stages. Later, a separately measured processing batch showed how different a hulled harvest weight can be from the cleaned grain returned. The crop deserves both kinds of attention: the growing field and the work needed to make its grain usable.\", \"stages\": [{\"title\": \"Leaves and basal shoots\", \"text\": \"Wheat begins with narrow seedling leaves and roots, then makes basal shoots called tillers. Some of these shoots will carry heads. The early stand’s density and access to light, water and nutrients shape the crop that follows.\"}, {\"title\": \"Stem extension and heading\", \"text\": \"Stem sections lengthen, lifting the developing head within the plant. Near heading, the upper leaf sheath swells around it—the boot stage. The head then emerges above the canopy, giving the field its familiar outline of wheat ears.\"}, {\"title\": \"Flowering and grain filling\", \"text\": \"After flowering, the small kernels fill. Their contents pass from watery and milky to soft dough, hard dough and finally hard grain. Leaves remain important during this period because they supply much of the energy going into the kernels.\"}, {\"title\": \"A hulled harvest\", \"text\": \"Cutting and drying prepare the crop for threshing, but emmer’s grain remains enclosed in its hull. Dehusking is a further operation before the cleaned wheat can be milled. Hull removal and flour milling therefore produce different kinds of weight loss.\"}], \"care\": [{\"title\": \"Build a balanced stand\", \"text\": \"A dense, heavily fed crop can be more vulnerable to lodging. Choose locally suitable sowing and nutrient plans that account for the variety, soil and previous inputs. More height and more leaf are not automatic signs of a better harvest.\"}, {\"title\": \"Keep roots supplied during growth\", \"text\": \"Water availability matters as stems grow, heads develop and grain fills. Base irrigation on soil moisture and local crop advice, keeping drainage in view. A calendar alone cannot show whether the root zone is short of water or still wet.\"}, {\"title\": \"Prepare for harvest and dehusking\", \"text\": \"Lodged patches can be harder to cut and may stay damp longer than standing heads. Inspect their maturity separately, and arrange a suitable drying space and dehusking route. Gentle handling and clean equipment help keep each lot useful through the extra processing step.\"}], \"farm\": {\"season\": \"Recorded season · Rabi 2025–26 and June processing\", \"summary\": \"The owner’s account follows a hand-cut crop and a later dehusking trial. Lodging cause remained unresolved. The April harvest was weighed in hulled form; the June recovery belongs to one measured batch, not to the whole harvest.\", \"events\": [{\"date\": \"2026-03-20\", \"label\": \"Some stems had fallen\", \"text\": \"About 10% of the crop was estimated to have lodged. Wind and unsettled weather were being watched, but no single cause was established.\"}, {\"date\": \"2026-04-09\", \"label\": \"Cutting in stages\", \"text\": \"Roughly 70% had been cut. Some grain felt hard, though there was uncertainty about cutting a portion early; cut stalks were left to dry further.\"}, {\"date\": \"2026-04-18\", \"label\": \"Hulled harvest recorded\", \"text\": \"The harvest total was recorded as 510 kg of hulled Khapli. The grain still needed dehusking.\"}, {\"date\": \"2026-06-10\", \"label\": \"One processing batch measured\", \"text\": \"A 54 kg hulled batch returned 32.5 kg of cleaned grain, about 60.2%. The difference included hulls, removed material and any processing losses; it is not the recovery for all 510 kg.\"}]}, \"issues\": [{\"title\": \"Fallen stems before harvest\", \"text\": \"Document the patch and inspect representative plants. Separate a possible trigger from a confirmed cause, and area lodged from measured grain loss.\", \"guide\": \"lodging-when-a-crop-falls\"}, {\"title\": \"A crop that is not ready all at once\", \"text\": \"Compare grain and moisture across the field, including standing and lodged patches. Keep cutting and threshing dates distinct.\", \"guide\": \"uneven-crop-maturity\"}, {\"title\": \"Confusing hulled grain with cleaned grain\", \"text\": \"Record the form of every weight. A dehusking recovery needs a matched input and output from the same batch.\", \"guide\": \"hulled-wheat-and-milling\"}], \"food\": {\"text\": \"After dehusking, the cleaned wheat can be milled into flour or prepared in other grain forms. Dehusking removes the enclosing hull; it is a different operation from refining away bran. Khapli is wheat, and the name does not mean gluten-free. The farm’s June batch measured dehusking recovery, not a flour yield.\", \"guide\": \"hulled-wheat-and-milling\"}, \"readings\": [\"khapli-from-field-to-grain\", \"lodging-when-a-crop-falls\", \"harvest-ready-grain\", \"hulled-wheat-and-milling\"], \"sources\": [{\"title\": \"ICAR–IARI · Emmer wheat and the name Khapli\", \"url\": \"https://www.iari.res.in/files/Publication/Nilgiri_Wheat_News/NWN_11_23082023.pdf\", \"accessed\": \"2026-10-24\"}, {\"title\": \"University of Minnesota Extension · Wheat growth and development\", \"url\": \"https://extension.umn.edu/agriculture/crop-production/small-grains/spring-wheat-growth-and-development-guide\", \"accessed\": \"2026-10-24\"}, {\"title\": \"Penn State · Emmer and other value-added small grains\", \"url\": \"https://plantscience.psu.edu/research/projects/grains/heritage-grains\", \"accessed\": \"2026-10-24\"}, {\"title\": \"Health Canada · Wheat names and gluten\", \"url\": \"https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/food-nutrition/reports-publications/food-safety/wheat-priority-food-allergen.html\", \"accessed\": \"2026-10-24\"}, {\"title\": \"Cornell CALS · Small-grain stand density, nutrition and lodging\", \"url\": \"https://cals.cornell.edu/field-crops/small-grains/fertilizers-for-small-grains\", \"accessed\": \"2026-10-24\"}]}", "type": "Crop profile", "url": "/crops/khapli-wheat/", "tags": ["khapli-wheat"]}, {"title": "Mustard", "summary": "From October sowing to the questions that follow emergence. Explore the work of establishing an oilseed crop and the place it holds in the farm calendar.", "text": "From October sowing to the questions that follow emergence. Explore the work of establishing an oilseed crop and the place it holds in the farm calendar. {\"botanicalName\": \"Brassica spp. · exact farm species unconfirmed\", \"kind\": \"Annual oilseed crop · recorded in the farm notes as sarso\", \"season\": \"Rabi in the recorded 2026–27 farm season; October sowing is the latest confirmed milestone.\", \"opening\": \"Mustard begins close to the ground, with small seedlings and leaves gathering around the young stem. Later it rises and branches, opening flowers that give way to slender pods carrying the seed. Those changes bring different work: helping an even stand establish, keeping weeds from taking its place, and following flowering and seed filling before deciding on harvest. The crop’s small beginnings matter as much as its taller, more visible stages. Our farm story starts with October sowing, at the point where the next visit needs to look for seedlings and learn how well that first operation has taken hold.\", \"stages\": [{\"title\": \"Seed and seedling\", \"text\": \"The seed absorbs moisture, a root emerges and the shoot brings its seed leaves above ground. A fine seedbed gives the small seed a better setting for even establishment. Surface crusting, clods or trapped water can leave gaps in the stand.\"}, {\"title\": \"Leaves, stems and branches\", \"text\": \"The young plant builds leaves before stems extend and branches develop. This is the stage when a thin or crowded stand becomes visible. Weed removal and, where locally appropriate, thinning help the crop use the space available.\"}, {\"title\": \"Flowers become pods\", \"text\": \"Flowering spreads through the branched crop and slender seed-bearing pods develop behind it. Flowers and young pods may be present together. This is a useful time to look closely for aphid colonies and other active feeding around the tender growth.\"}, {\"title\": \"Seed filling and ripening\", \"text\": \"Seeds enlarge inside the pods as the crop moves towards maturity. Pods change colour and dry, while different branches may finish at different times. Cutting, drying and threshing must be timed to recover mature seed without unnecessary loss.\"}], \"care\": [{\"title\": \"Start with soil that can support small seed\", \"text\": \"Prepare a fine, reasonably level surface with a route for excess water to leave. Moisture at sowing matters, but a saturated patch is a different problem from a dry seedbed. Choose establishment work to suit the soil in front of you.\"}, {\"title\": \"Feed for the crop and the soil\", \"text\": \"Mustard needs nutrients to build leaves, stems and seed, including sulphur where the soil supply is inadequate. Use a soil-based local plan that counts earlier inputs. Adding every nutrient to every field is not a substitute for finding what is lacking.\"}, {\"title\": \"Manage weeds early and scout as it grows\", \"text\": \"Early weeds compete with small plants for light, moisture and nutrients. Keep that first competition in check, then carry inspection up into the branches and flowers. Aphid colonies, chewing and disease-like marks need different identifications before a response is chosen.\"}], \"farm\": {\"season\": \"Historical notes · Rabi 2026–27 · latest report 18 October 2026\", \"summary\": \"The archive records sowing under the crop name sarso, with planting reports from more than one area. The species and variety allocation are not confirmed here. No emergence, stand assessment, flowering or harvest update is established by these notes.\", \"events\": [{\"date\": \"2026-10-13\", \"label\": \"A planting report\", \"text\": \"Mustard planting was reported in one area, while sowing elsewhere was being tracked separately.\"}, {\"date\": \"2026-10-18\", \"label\": \"Sowing complete\", \"text\": \"Sowing was reported complete across both recorded areas. The next stage needs its own emergence and establishment observations.\"}]}, \"issues\": [{\"title\": \"A completed job with no stand check yet\", \"text\": \"Return to inspect emergence and mark thin or wet patches. The record should distinguish seed in the ground from an established crop.\", \"guide\": \"mustard-after-the-monsoon\"}, {\"title\": \"A crop name without a full seed identity\", \"text\": \"Retain the label and lot, then record species and variety where confirmed. Sarso is a useful working name but cannot settle the identity of a seed lot.\", \"guide\": \"seed-labels-and-sowing\"}], \"food\": {\"text\": \"Mustard seed is used as a spice and as a source of oil, but harvest, cleaning and processing still stand between a crop and a usable product. This planting has no confirmed harvest or processing record yet, so there is no farm oil yield or kitchen batch to report.\", \"guide\": null}, \"readings\": [\"mustard-after-the-monsoon\", \"seed-labels-and-sowing\", \"understanding-the-farm-calendar\"], \"sources\": [{\"title\": \"KVK Anjaw · Rapeseed–mustard establishment and harvest stages\", \"url\": \"https://www.kvkanjaw.nic.in/pages/Package/Agro/oilseed.html\", \"accessed\": \"2026-10-24\"}, {\"title\": \"TNAU · Mustard crop stages and monitoring\", \"url\": \"https://agritech.tnau.ac.in/crop_protection/crop_prot_ipm_mustard.html\", \"accessed\": \"2026-10-24\"}, {\"title\": \"TNAU · Mustard as an oilseed crop\", \"url\": \"https://agritech.tnau.ac.in/crop_protection/crop_prot_crop%20diseases_oilseeds_rapeseed%20and%20mustard.html\", \"accessed\": \"2026-10-24\"}, {\"title\": \"TNAU · Mustard among minor spice crops\", \"url\": \"https://agritech.tnau.ac.in/horticulture/horti_spice%20crops_minor%20spices.html\", \"accessed\": \"2026-10-24\"}]}", "type": "Crop profile", "url": "/crops/mustard/", "tags": ["mustard"]}, {"title": "Rice: the grain beneath the husk", "summary": "Follow the grain from its place on the panicle through husking, milling and the forms that reach a kitchen.", "text": "{\"name\": \"Rice\", \"title\": \"Rice: the grain beneath the husk\", \"dek\": \"Follow the grain from its place on the panicle through husking, milling and the forms that reach a kitchen.\", \"opening\": \"Inside a rice panicle, each developing grain fills beneath a close-fitting husk. That covering stays with the grain when it leaves the plant as paddy. What happens next determines the form we recognise in a kitchen: remove the husk and the edible kernel appears; remove more of its outer layers and the grain changes again. Following those layers makes familiar words such as brown rice and milled rice easier to understand.\", \"hero\": {\"image\": \"rice-flowering\", \"alt\": \"Flowering rice panicles rise among long green leaves.\", \"caption\": \"Flowering rice from our farm archive. The harvest figures below describe our separate Kala Namak crop in 2025.\"}, \"stages\": [{\"title\": \"The grain fills\", \"text\": \"After flowering, the developing rice grain fills within its husk. Ripening takes the grain towards maturity; a panicle can contain grains at slightly different stages. The crop’s appearance and the condition of its grains together inform the harvest decision.\"}, {\"title\": \"The crop is cut and threshed\", \"text\": \"Harvest removes the crop from the field. Threshing separates paddy grains from the panicle and straw. A combine can bring cutting and threshing into one operation, but the husk still surrounds the grain that comes out.\"}, {\"title\": \"Paddy is cleaned and dried\", \"text\": \"Cleaning removes pieces of straw and other foreign material. Drying reduces grain moisture for the next handling or storage stage. Neither operation removes the close-fitting husk, and drying needs to be even enough to protect grain quality.\"}, {\"title\": \"The husk is removed\", \"text\": \"A husker opens and removes the outer hull. Beneath it is the rice kernel with its bran layers still present: brown rice. The loose husk is a separate material; it is not the bran that remains on the kernel.\"}, {\"title\": \"Further milling removes bran\", \"text\": \"To make white rice, further milling removes bran layers and much of the germ, leaving mainly the starchy endosperm. The degree of milling describes how much has been removed. This is a processing choice, separate from the variety’s name.\"}, {\"title\": \"Whole and broken kernels are separated\", \"text\": \"Some kernels break during handling and milling. Grading can separate those pieces from the longer, intact kernels. A finished lot may include a stated proportion of broken rice; the form and grade help describe the ingredient that reaches the kitchen.\"}], \"forms\": [{\"id\": \"paddy\", \"label\": \"Paddy\", \"title\": \"The husk is still on\", \"text\": \"Paddy, also called rough rice, is the harvested grain enclosed in its husk. Cleaning can remove loose field material without changing this basic form. The edible rice kernel is still inside.\", \"changes\": \"Removed from the plant; loose material cleaned away\", \"remains\": \"Husk around the bran-covered rice kernel\", \"kind\": \"paddy\"}, {\"id\": \"brown\", \"label\": \"Brown rice\", \"title\": \"The husk is off; bran remains\", \"text\": \"Husking exposes the kernel while leaving its bran and germ largely intact. Brown rice describes this processing stage, rather than a single variety. The retained outer layer can also be reddish or purple in coloured rice.\", \"changes\": \"Husk removed\", \"remains\": \"Bran, germ and endosperm\", \"kind\": \"brown\"}, {\"id\": \"white\", \"label\": \"White rice\", \"title\": \"Further milling exposes the centre\", \"text\": \"White or milled rice has had the husk removed and the bran layers and much of the germ taken away by further milling. A white grain has therefore passed through a different degree of processing from brown rice.\", \"changes\": \"Bran layers and much of the germ removed\", \"remains\": \"Mainly the starchy endosperm\", \"kind\": \"white\"}], \"batch\": {\"title\": \"Kala Namak: one harvest, two routes\", \"season\": \"2025 harvest\", \"text\": \"Seven sacks of paddy at 30 kg each made a 210 kg harvest. About 70 kg was kept as paddy, leaving approximately 140 kg for processing into rice. These figures describe how the paddy was divided.\", \"figures\": [{\"value\": \"210 kg\", \"label\": \"Paddy harvested · 7 × 30 kg\"}, {\"value\": \"≈70 kg\", \"label\": \"Paddy retained\"}, {\"value\": \"≈140 kg\", \"label\": \"Paddy allocated to processing\"}], \"note\": \"The retained and processing quantities are two portions of the harvest. They do not give the weight of rice returned from the mill or establish a milling recovery.\"}, \"questions\": [{\"question\": \"Is brown rice a different variety?\", \"answer\": \"Brown rice describes rice after the husk has been removed while bran remains. Many varieties can be processed this way. Ask for both the variety name and the milling description when choosing a lot.\"}, {\"question\": \"Does broken rice mean a different crop?\", \"answer\": \"Broken kernels are pieces separated during grading, rather than a variety of their own. Ask whether a quoted quantity includes both whole and broken kernels; a whole-kernel weight alone does not describe every rice fraction returned.\"}, {\"question\": \"Where does parboiled rice fit?\", \"answer\": \"Parboiling uses moisture and heat while the grain is still in its hull, before later processing. It is a separate choice from how much bran is removed. A variety name alone does not tell you whether rice was parboiled.\"}], \"readings\": [\"rice-from-paddy-to-plate\", \"reading-rice-development\", \"between-seasons\"], \"sources\": [{\"title\": \"FAO · Rice growth stages\", \"url\": \"https://www.fao.org/4/t7202e/t7202e07.htm\", \"accessed\": \"2026-10-24\"}, {\"title\": \"IRRI Service Laboratories · Paddy, husking and milling\", \"url\": \"https://isl.irri.org/services/rice-plant-grain-and-soil-physico-chemical-analyses/rice-grain-sample-prep-submission-guide\", \"accessed\": \"2026-10-24\"}, {\"title\": \"ICAR National Rice Research Institute · Brown rice and polished rice, FAQs 20–24\", \"url\": \"https://icar-crri.in/faq/\", \"accessed\": \"2026-10-24\"}, {\"title\": \"PHilMech · Grain drying and quality\", \"url\": \"https://rcef.philmech.gov.ph/?action=grainDrying&page=knowledgeBank\", \"accessed\": \"2026-10-24\"}, {\"title\": \"IRRI Rice Today · Rice milling, grading and parboiling\", \"url\": \"https://ricetoday.irri.org/a-consumers-guide-to-rice/\", \"accessed\": \"2026-10-24\"}, {\"title\": \"FAO · Harvesting, threshing and cleaning cereals\", \"url\": \"https://www.fao.org/4/T1838E/T1838E0P.HTM\", \"accessed\": \"2026-10-24\"}]}", "type": "Food journey", "url": "/food/rice/", "tags": ["rice", "food", "harvest", "processing"]}, {"title": "Chana: one crop, four forms", "summary": "A pod, a seed coat and the two halves inside explain how a chickpea becomes several familiar ingredients.", "text": "{\"name\": \"Chana\", \"title\": \"Chana: one crop, four forms\", \"dek\": \"A pod, a seed coat and the two halves inside explain how a chickpea becomes several familiar ingredients.\", \"opening\": \"A chana pod is a small package on a branching plant. Inside it, the seed develops its own covering: the seed coat. Those are two different layers, removed at different moments. After harvest, clean dry seeds can remain whole, or lose their coats and separate into dal. Grinding the dehusked Bengal gram produces besan. The route is a series of physical changes, each giving the same crop a different form for the kitchen.\", \"hero\": {\"image\": \"chana-pods\", \"alt\": \"Green chana pods sit among small toothed leaflets on branching stems.\", \"caption\": \"Pods among the leaves in our chana archive.\"}, \"stages\": [{\"title\": \"Flowers lead to filling pods\", \"text\": \"Chana flowers develop into pods containing the seeds. The plant can continue making new growth after flowering begins, so flowers, filling pods and older pods may be present together. A developed pod does not always mean the seed inside has finished filling.\"}, {\"title\": \"Seeds mature as the crop dries\", \"text\": \"The developing seeds gain substance before the crop dries down towards harvest. Uneven maturity can leave one part of a crop ready while another is still growing. Harvest assessment needs a look inside representative pods as well as at their colour.\"}, {\"title\": \"Threshing releases the seeds\", \"text\": \"After cutting and suitable drying, threshing separates the seeds from pods and plant material. Cleaning removes pieces of pod, stalk, dust and other unwanted material. The chickpea’s close-fitting seed coat is still present; it is not the discarded pod wall.\"}, {\"title\": \"Clean seeds can remain whole\", \"text\": \"Whole dry chana keeps the seed coat around the inner seed. This is one possible ingredient at the end of cleaning and drying. It does not need to become dal or flour: those are further routes from the harvested pulse.\"}, {\"title\": \"Dehusking and splitting make dal\", \"text\": \"Pulse milling removes the seed coat and separates the seed into its two halves, the cotyledons. Cleaning, dehusking, splitting and separation may require several passes. The split material is chana dal, a different form from a whole chickpea.\"}, {\"title\": \"Grinding makes besan\", \"text\": \"Besan is flour made by grinding dehusked Bengal gram, commonly from chana dal. Grinding reduces the pieces to flour; the pod and seed coat have already been removed. The fineness can be selected for the intended ingredient or product.\"}], \"forms\": [{\"id\": \"pod\", \"label\": \"In the pod\", \"title\": \"A seed within a separate covering\", \"text\": \"The pod grows on the plant and contains the developing chickpea seed. Its wall is the outer package. Within that package, each seed has its own seed coat. A pod can look developed while the seed is still filling.\", \"changes\": \"Flower develops into a pod; seed fills inside\", \"remains\": \"Pod wall around seed with its own coat\", \"kind\": \"pod\"}, {\"id\": \"whole\", \"label\": \"Whole chana\", \"title\": \"A dry seed with its coat\", \"text\": \"Threshing removes the seed from the pod. Once cleaned and suitably dried, the whole seed still carries its seed coat. That close-fitting coat is the layer removed during later dehusking for dal.\", \"changes\": \"Pod and loose field material removed\", \"remains\": \"Seed coat and the whole inner seed\", \"kind\": \"whole\"}, {\"id\": \"dal\", \"label\": \"Chana dal\", \"title\": \"The coat is off; the seed is split\", \"text\": \"Chana dal is dehusked and split Bengal gram. The two pieces are the seed’s cotyledons. Splitting a pulse is different from a rice kernel breaking accidentally during milling: here, separation into halves is the intended product.\", \"changes\": \"Seed coat removed; inner seed split into halves\", \"remains\": \"The two cotyledons as separate pieces\", \"kind\": \"dal\"}, {\"id\": \"besan\", \"label\": \"Besan\", \"title\": \"Dehusked Bengal gram, ground to flour\", \"text\": \"Grinding dehusked Bengal gram makes besan. Chana dal is a common starting material. The flour is therefore another step along this route, rather than a powder made from the discarded pod or a new crop.\", \"changes\": \"Dehusked grain ground into flour\", \"remains\": \"Bengal gram in small flour particles\", \"kind\": \"besan\"}], \"batch\": {\"title\": \"The chana harvest after cleaning\", \"season\": \"Rabi 2025–26 · 18 April 2026\", \"text\": \"The farm’s cleaned chana quantity reached 1,950 kg after a season of uneven maturity and staggered work. This is the whole cleaned crop at the recorded stage; no quantity of dal or besan is established by that figure.\", \"figures\": [{\"value\": \"1,950 kg\", \"label\": \"Cleaned chana recorded\"}], \"note\": \"This is a cleaned-seed weight, before any further milling into dal or flour.\"}, \"questions\": [{\"question\": \"Is the pod the same as the “husk” removed for dal?\", \"answer\": \"No. Threshing separates the seed from the pod. The later dehusking step in pulse milling removes the seed coat attached to that seed. Looking for those two coverings makes the sequence easier to follow.\"}, {\"question\": \"Can whole chana, dal and besan be treated as the same ingredient?\", \"answer\": \"They come from the same crop, but have different physical forms: coated whole seed, dehusked halves and flour. Choose the form named in the preparation you intend to make; processing has already changed what is in the bag.\"}, {\"question\": \"Is every chickpea flour the same as besan?\", \"answer\": \"Ask what was ground. The besan definition used here is flour from dehusked Bengal gram, often chana dal. A flour made by grinding whole chickpeas with their coats follows a different route, so “chickpea flour” alone can leave the processing unclear.\"}], \"readings\": [\"chana-a-season-in-stages\", \"chana-from-pod-to-pantry\", \"uneven-crop-maturity\"], \"sources\": [{\"title\": \"Montana State University Extension · Chickpea growth and processing forms\", \"url\": \"https://extension-store.montana.edu/montguides/chickpea-production\", \"accessed\": \"2026-10-24\"}, {\"title\": \"TNAU · Bengal gram pod maturity\", \"url\": \"https://agritech.tnau.ac.in/seed_certification/seed_pul_bengalgram.html\", \"accessed\": \"2026-10-24\"}, {\"title\": \"TNAU · Pulse processing and dal milling\", \"url\": \"https://agritech.tnau.ac.in/postharvest/pht_pulses_processing.html\", \"accessed\": \"2026-10-24\"}, {\"title\": \"FSSAI · Besan definition, section 2.4.4\", \"url\": \"https://www.fssai.gov.in/upload/uploadfiles/files/Compendium_Food_Additives_Regulations_04_01_2022.pdf\", \"accessed\": \"2026-10-24\"}, {\"title\": \"Government of India ISTI / CSIR-CFTRI · Grinding Bengal gram dal into besan\", \"url\": \"https://www.indiascienceandtechnology.gov.in/technologies/processed-besan-bengal-gram-suitable-fo-sev-and-boondi\", \"accessed\": \"2026-10-24\"}]}", "type": "Food journey", "url": "/food/chana/", "tags": ["chana", "food", "harvest", "processing"]}, {"title": "Khapli: from hull to flour", "summary": "Emmer wheat keeps an extra covering after threshing. Releasing the kernel comes before deciding how to mill it.", "text": "{\"name\": \"Khapli wheat\", \"title\": \"Khapli: from hull to flour\", \"dek\": \"Emmer wheat keeps an extra covering after threshing. Releasing the kernel comes before deciding how to mill it.\", \"opening\": \"A harvested Khapli grain can still be hidden inside its husk. Khapli is a name used for emmer, one of the hulled wheats, whose covering does not fall away in the same way as free-threshing wheat. That adds a distinct operation before the grain reaches a flour mill. Removing the husk exposes the kernel; grinding the kernel makes flour. The difference becomes tangible when a hulled batch is weighed before and after processing.\", \"hero\": {\"image\": \"khapli-heads\", \"alt\": \"Green awned wheat heads stand above the leaves in the Khapli field.\", \"caption\": \"Khapli heads from our farm archive. The grain’s journey continues beyond threshing.\"}, \"stages\": [{\"title\": \"Kernels develop within the head\", \"text\": \"After the head emerges and flowers, the wheat kernels fill. Their contents move from watery and milky stages through dough stages as dry matter accumulates. Maturity finishes this filling process; later drying removes moisture rather than continuing grain growth.\"}, {\"title\": \"Harvest and threshing separate the crop\", \"text\": \"Cutting removes the standing crop. Threshing separates harvested material from straw, but in a hulled wheat the kernels can remain enclosed in the tight coverings of the spikelets. The first bag is therefore not necessarily grain ready to grind.\"}, {\"title\": \"Cleaning and drying prepare the material\", \"text\": \"Loose straw, dust and other foreign material need separation, and moisture needs to suit the next operation. These preparatory jobs differ from dehulling: a clean-looking lot of hulled wheat can still have its close-fitting coverings around the kernels.\"}, {\"title\": \"Dehulling releases the kernels\", \"text\": \"The dehuller loosens or breaks away the coverings surrounding the grain. The released hulls then need separating from the heavier kernels. Pieces that remain unhulled may need another pass, so the material leaving the first pass can be a mixture.\"}, {\"title\": \"Clean kernels retain edible layers\", \"text\": \"Once the loose coverings and unwanted material are separated, the wheat kernel is visible. It still has bran, germ and endosperm. The bran belongs to the edible kernel; it is different from the hull removed around it.\"}, {\"title\": \"Milling turns kernels into flour\", \"text\": \"Grinding reduces the clean kernels to flour. Wholemeal retains bran, germ and endosperm in their original proportions; sifting can remove some fractions. The amount of clean grain returned by a dehuller is therefore a different result from the flour returned after milling.\"}], \"forms\": [{\"id\": \"hulled\", \"label\": \"Hulled harvest\", \"title\": \"The grain is still enclosed\", \"text\": \"Here, “hulled harvest” means Khapli harvested with its husk still attached. Emmer belongs to the hulled wheats, which need an extra release step after threshing. This material includes the outer covering as well as the kernel within.\", \"changes\": \"Separated from the standing crop and straw\", \"remains\": \"Tight hulls around the wheat kernels\", \"kind\": \"hulled\"}, {\"id\": \"cleaned\", \"label\": \"Clean kernels\", \"title\": \"Hulls off; bran stays\", \"text\": \"Dehulling and separation release the kernel from its outer covering. Cleaning then leaves the grain for further use or milling. Removing the hull is not the same operation as removing bran, and does not by itself make refined flour.\", \"changes\": \"Hulls and loose unwanted material separated\", \"remains\": \"Bran, germ and endosperm in each kernel\", \"kind\": \"cleaned\"}, {\"id\": \"flour\", \"label\": \"Flour\", \"title\": \"The kernels are ground\", \"text\": \"Milling changes clean kernels into flour. If bran, germ and endosperm remain in their original proportions, the flour is wholemeal. If fractions are sifted away, its composition changes. The word “Khapli” identifies the wheat, not the degree of sifting.\", \"changes\": \"Kernels ground; some fractions may be sifted\", \"remains\": \"Wheat flour, with composition set by milling\", \"kind\": \"flour\"}], \"batch\": {\"title\": \"A June batch, before and after dehulling\", \"season\": \"10 June 2026\", \"text\": \"A 54 kg batch of hulled Khapli produced 32.5 kg of clean grain. Dividing the clean-grain weight by the hulled input gives approximately 60.2% recovery for this particular batch.\", \"figures\": [{\"value\": \"54 kg\", \"label\": \"Hulled batch sent for processing\"}, {\"value\": \"32.5 kg\", \"label\": \"Clean grain returned\"}, {\"value\": \"60.2%\", \"label\": \"Clean-grain recovery for this batch\"}], \"note\": \"This paired measurement describes the June batch. It does not establish recovery for the whole 510 kg harvest, a flour yield, or the individual weights of hulls, other material and processing losses.\"}, \"questions\": [{\"question\": \"Does “hulled” mean the covering has already been removed?\", \"answer\": \"The word can be ambiguous in everyday use. In this farm account, “hulled Khapli” means the harvested wheat still enclosed in its husk. Ask explicitly whether a bag contains husk-covered material or clean, dehulled kernels.\"}, {\"question\": \"Does taking off the husk make refined flour?\", \"answer\": \"No. Dehulling removes the outer covering around the kernel. Bran remains on the clean kernel until a later milling or sifting operation removes it. Grinding clean kernels with their edible parts retained can produce wholemeal flour.\"}, {\"question\": \"Is Khapli gluten-free?\", \"answer\": \"No. Khapli is wheat and contains gluten. Dehulling and ordinary flour milling do not make it gluten-free. Its name and age do not change that distinction when choosing ingredients.\"}], \"readings\": [\"khapli-from-field-to-grain\", \"hulled-wheat-and-milling\", \"drying-cleaning-and-storing-grain\"], \"sources\": [{\"title\": \"ICAR–IARI · Emmer wheat and the name Khapli\", \"url\": \"https://www.iari.res.in/files/Publication/Nilgiri_Wheat_News/NWN_11_23082023.pdf\", \"accessed\": \"2026-10-24\"}, {\"title\": \"Penn State · Emmer and other hulled grains\", \"url\": \"https://plantscience.psu.edu/research/projects/grains/heritage-grains\", \"accessed\": \"2026-10-24\"}, {\"title\": \"University of Minnesota Extension · Wheat grain filling and maturity\", \"url\": \"https://extension.umn.edu/agriculture/crop-production/small-grains/spring-wheat-growth-and-development-guide\", \"accessed\": \"2026-10-24\"}, {\"title\": \"Penn State Extension · Whole kernels, wholemeal and refinement\", \"url\": \"https://extension.psu.edu/downloadable/download/sample/sample_id/120693/\", \"accessed\": \"2026-10-24\"}, {\"title\": \"Health Canada · Wheat names and gluten\", \"url\": \"https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/food-nutrition/reports-publications/food-safety/wheat-priority-food-allergen.html\", \"accessed\": \"2026-10-24\"}, {\"title\": \"eOrganic / USDA NIFA research project · Dehulling emmer and separating hulls\", \"url\": \"https://eorganic.org/node/13028\", \"accessed\": \"2026-10-24\"}]}", "type": "Food journey", "url": "/food/khapli-wheat/", "tags": ["khapli-wheat", "food", "harvest", "processing"]}]BROWSE BY TOPIC
Seed & soil
Begin with the seed, the soil and a plan for the crop.
Feeding the crop
Understand the nutrients, the product and the route to the plant.
Pests, weeds & damage
Look closer at leaves, roots, weeds and uneven growth.
Water & roots
Follow irrigation, rain and the conditions below the surface.
Field work
Connect the calendar, the machines and the work that gets done.
Harvest & processing
Follow the crop through cutting, drying, milling and the pantry.